[PATCHv3 TRIVIAL] IB/core: Documentation fix to ib_mad_snoop_handler in the MAD header file

In ib_mad.h, ib_mad_snoop_handler uses send_buf rather than send_wr Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock --- Change since v2: Changed title to use "higher" language Change since v1: Fixed typo in patch description diff --git a/include/rdma/ib_mad.h b/include/rdma/ib_mad.h index

RE: [PATCHv3 TRIVIAL] IB/core: Documentation fix to ib_mad_snoop_handler in the MAD header file

> In ib_mad.h, ib_mad_snoop_handler uses send_buf rather than send_wr The MAD snooping should be removed from the mad stack. There are no in tree users and the only attempt at adding one was rejected.

RE: [PATCHv3 TRIVIAL] IB/core: Documentation fix to ib_mad_snoop_handler in the MAD header file

> > There are no in tree users and the only attempt at adding one was > rejected. > > There are no in tree users of this but there is your madeye tool (which > is out of tree). This is still a useful debug tool for MADs and there > are people who still use that. It's an out of tree tool.

Re: [PATCHv3 TRIVIAL] IB/core: Documentation fix to ib_mad_snoop_handler in the MAD header file

On 1/5/2016 12:38 PM, Hefty, Sean wrote: >> In ib_mad.h, ib_mad_snoop_handler uses send_buf rather than send_wr > > The MAD snooping should be removed from the mad stack. This last discussed on linux-rdma list back in late September when Ira posted a partial RFC patch to do this. > There are

Re: [PATCHv3 TRIVIAL] IB/core: Documentation fix to ib_mad_snoop_handler in the MAD header file

On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Hefty, Sean wrote: >> > There are no in tree users and the only attempt at adding one was >> rejected. >> >> There are no in tree users of this but there is your madeye tool (which >> is out of tree). This is still a useful debug tool for MADs