On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 11:34:12AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
+
+/*
+ * PREEMPT_RCU data structures.
+ */
+
+#define GP_STAGES 4
+struct rcu_data {
+ spinlock_t lock; /* Protect rcu_data fields. */
+ longcompleted; /* Number of last completed
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] ARCH PowerPC: Consider new flags in assembler instructions
Additional flags in bit 16 and 17 require changes in the assembler code to
handle these new flags. The old instructions only can handle 16 bits. Now
there are 18.
Note: I'm not an expert in PowerPC assembler, so there
Signed-off-by: Tony Breeds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Updated to create a clocksource driver specific to the 601
Updated to address feedback from sfr
Only compile tested.
arch/powerpc/Kconfig |6
arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c | 255 -
2 files changed, 91
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 11:20:48AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 11:34:12AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
+
+/*
+ * PREEMPT_RCU data structures.
+ */
+
+#define GP_STAGES 4
+struct rcu_data {
+ spinlock_t lock; /* Protect rcu_data fields.
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 07:23:09PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
--
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
If you do a synchronize_rcu() it might well have to wait through the
following sequence of states:
Stage 0: (might have to wait through part of this to get out of next
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 10:40:03AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 11:34:12AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
Covering the pieces that weren't in Peter's reply. ;-)
And thank you -very- much for the careful and thorough
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 09:19:22PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
--
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
In any case, I will be looking at the scenarios more carefully. If
it turns out that GP_STAGES can indeed be cranked down a bit, well,
that is an easy change! I just
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 09:15:03PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 10:40:03AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 11:34:12AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
[ . . . ]
+ /*
+* Take the
[ sneaks away from the family for a bit to answer emails ]
--
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 09:19:22PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
--
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
In any case, I will be looking at the scenarios more
[took off Ingo, because he has my ISP blacklisted, and I'm tired of
getting those return mail messages. He can read LKML or you can re-CC
him. Sad since this is a topic he should be reading. ]
--
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 09:15:03PM -0400, Steven
10 matches
Mail list logo
