On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 20:13 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 10:22:37AM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
Strange rcu_read_unlock() which causes a imbalance, and boot hang.. I
didn't notice a reason for it, and removing it allows my system to make
progress.
This
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 06:37:19AM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 20:13 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 10:22:37AM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
Strange rcu_read_unlock() which causes a imbalance, and boot hang.. I
didn't notice a reason for it,
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 07:06 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
I was wondering what kind of side effects would happen with the
preemptible RCU ..
Well, if you had only one rcu_read_lock() outstanding in the system,
it would appear to be in a quiescent state, which would not be good.
Given
Strange rcu_read_unlock() which causes a imbalance, and boot hang.. I
didn't notice a reason for it, and removing it allows my system to make
progress.
This should go into the preempt-realtime-sched.patch
Signed-Off-By: Daniel Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux-2.6.22.1/kernel/sched.c