rote:
> >
> >
> > --
> > On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Jaswinder Singh wrote:
> >
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > how can I get old rt patches :-
> > >
> > > 2.6.13-rt1
> > > 2.6.14-rt1
> > > 2.6.15-rt1
> > >
&
--
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Jaswinder Singh wrote:
> Steve,
>
> Thanks for your ketchup.
>
> Please let me know:
>
> 1. Is 2.6.13-rt1 is first rt version
Not by a long shot. The earliest hint of a RT patch I have is a left over
vi swap file:
.realtime-preempt-2.6.10-rc1-mm3-V0.7.25-1.swp
I thin
wrote:
>
>
> --
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Jaswinder Singh wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > how can I get old rt patches :-
> >
> > 2.6.13-rt1
> > 2.6.14-rt1
> > 2.6.15-rt1
> >
> > I am not able to find them in
> > http://www.kern
--
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Jaswinder Singh wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> how can I get old rt patches :-
>
> 2.6.13-rt1
> 2.6.14-rt1
> 2.6.15-rt1
>
> I am not able to find them in
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/older/
>
> Can someone please email
Hello all,
how can I get old rt patches :-
2.6.13-rt1
2.6.14-rt1
2.6.15-rt1
I am not able to find them in
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/older/
Can someone please email these patches to me.
Thank you,
Jaswinder Singh.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 10:27 +0200, John Sigler wrote:
> Daniel Walker wrote:
>
> > John Sigler wrote:
> >
> >> Would anyone care to comment?
> >
> > I'm not sure if this is the answer that you're looking for, but yes you
> > certainly will find fixed bug is older version of the tree.
>
> I am n
Paul E. McKenney wrote:
John Sigler wrote:
I wrote a Linux app where I need high-resolution timers. I went all the
way and installed the -rt patch, which includes the -hrt patches, as far
as I understand.
Since I could not afford to change kernels with every new release, I
decided to track
Daniel Walker wrote:
John Sigler wrote:
Would anyone care to comment?
I'm not sure if this is the answer that you're looking for, but yes you
certainly will find fixed bug is older version of the tree.
I am not a kernel hacker, therefore I can only imagine how complex it is
to bring real-
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 10:55 +0200, John Sigler wrote:
> John Sigler wrote:
>
> Would anyone care to comment?
I'm not sure if this is the answer that you looking for, but yes you
certainly will find fixed bug is older version of the tree.
> Perhaps I could also test a different strategy, such as
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 10:55:44AM +0200, John Sigler wrote:
> John Sigler wrote:
>
> >I wrote a Linux app where I need high-resolution timers. I went all the
> >way and installed the -rt patch, which includes the -hrt patches, as far
> >as I understand.
> >
> >Since I could not afford to change
John Sigler wrote:
I wrote a Linux app where I need high-resolution timers. I went all the
way and installed the -rt patch, which includes the -hrt patches, as far
as I understand.
Since I could not afford to change kernels with every new release, I
decided to track the 2.6.20 branch (arbitr
Hello,
I wrote a Linux app where I need high-resolution timers. I went all the
way and installed the -rt patch, which includes the -hrt patches, as far
as I understand.
Since I could not afford to change kernels with every new release, I
decided to track the 2.6.20 branch (arbitrarily).
At
12 matches
Mail list logo
