Hello,
This patch set is for for-next branch.
Changes since v1:
[exynos5250.dtsi]
Added power domain support for MAU and ISP power domains in exynos5 dts
[pm_domains.c]
CLKSRC register is saved before PMU register is programmed
Replaced soc_is_exynos5250 with of_machine_is_compatible
Prasanna
This patch adds device tree nodes for MFC,G-scaler,MAU and ISP power domains
of exynos5.It binds these power-domain nodes to repsective device tree nodes.
Signed-off-by: Prasanna Kumar prasanna...@samsung.com
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 25 +
1 files
This patch adds support to enable PM generic domains
under Exynos5 family
Signed-off-by: Prasanna Kumar prasanna...@samsung.com
---
This patch is same as v1
arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
This patch adds a software workaround to the hardware
problem found in exynos5 while powergating.
It is observed that CLK_TOP_SRC3 register gets modified if
the G-Scaler/MFC devices are power gated. The clock for G-Scaler gets
set to XXTI which results in the device running very slow .
A big drop
ping.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Ajay Kumar ajaykumar...@samsung.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Ajay Kumar ajaykumar...@samsung.com
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi |6 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
ping.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Ajay Kumar ajaykumar...@samsung.com wrote:
Use AUXDATA to set the device names for G2D controller instance
discovered from device tree.
Signed-off-by: Ajay Kumar ajaykumar...@samsung.com
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-exynos5-dt.c |2 ++
1 files
ping.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Ajay Kumar ajaykumar...@samsung.com wrote:
Add g2d clock instance for EXYNOS5 g2d controller.
Signed-off-by: Ajay Kumar ajaykumar...@samsung.com
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/clock-exynos5.c |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:27:20AM -0800, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Hi Arnd, Olof
Here is Samsung fixes-1 for v3.8-rc1.
Most of them are trivial fixes which are for NULL pointer dereference, MSHC
clocks instance names and exynos5440 stuff.
Please pull from:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:27:26AM -0800, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Arnd, Olof
This is for fix the following build error in dev-audio.c on current Samsung
platforms :-(
arch/arm/mach-exynos/dev-audio.c:58:4: error: unknown field 'src_clk'
specified in initializer
Vivek,
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Vivek Gautam gautamvivek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Doug,
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 3:18 AM, Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org wrote:
Vivek,
Since you're changing the name, I would have expected to see a removal
of the old enum type in this patch. I
Hi, List
Does the current kernel 3.7.1 support S3C2416 (it's *6* not 0) LCD and
touch screen? I saw the help text of the CONFIG_FB_S3C says it only supports
S3C6400 and S3C6410.
Thanks in advance.
--
woody
I can't go back to yesterday - because I was a different person then.
--
To unsubscribe
Am Donnerstag, 20. Dezember 2012, 17:56:23 schrieb Woody Wu:
Hi, List
Does the current kernel 3.7.1 support S3C2416 (it's *6* not 0) LCD and
touch screen? I saw the help text of the CONFIG_FB_S3C says it only
supports S3C6400 and S3C6410.
if you look in the mach-smd2416.c file you'll see
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Vivek Gautam
gautamvivek1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:00 AM, Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 6:43 AM, Vivek Gautam gautam.vi...@samsung.com
wrote:
+static void s5p_ehci_phy_enable(struct s5p_ehci_hcd
Hi Doug,
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org wrote:
Vivek,
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Vivek Gautam gautamvivek1...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Doug,
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 3:18 AM, Doug Anderson diand...@chromium.org wrote:
Vivek,
Since you're changing
The size of memory bank should be under 256MB, because current
section size is 256MB on EXYNOS SoCs. This patch fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440-ssdk5440.dts |9 -
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
Since exynos5440 can support pinctrl so skip the legacy
gpiolib registration. If not, happens following.
WARNING: at drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c:3102 samsung_gpiolib_init+0x68/0x8c()
Unknown SoC in gpio-samsung, no GPIOs added
Acked-by: Thomas Abraham thomas...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Kukjin
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
The size of memory bank should be under 256MB, because current
section size is 256MB on EXYNOS SoCs. This patch fixes it.
This makes no sense. You don't have to split up memory ranges, the
code should be made to
Hi Prasanna,
On Thursday 20 of December 2012 17:56:18 Prasanna Kumar wrote:
This patch adds a software workaround to the hardware
problem found in exynos5 while powergating.
It is observed that CLK_TOP_SRC3 register gets modified if
the G-Scaler/MFC devices are power gated. The clock for
Hi Olof,
On Thursday 20 of December 2012 11:56:59 Olof Johansson wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com
wrote:
The size of memory bank should be under 256MB, because current
section size is 256MB on EXYNOS SoCs. This patch fixes it.
This makes no
I would like to ask a question here. Do we need to have sparse even if
the physical memory is contiguous? All the recent exynos machines come
with physical banks without any holes, and I am thinking why not drop it
and use flat mem instead. With LPAE these sections sizes wont be useful,
and I
Hi Subash,
On Thursday 20 of December 2012 14:19:48 Subash Patel wrote:
I would like to ask a question here. Do we need to have sparse even if
the physical memory is contiguous? All the recent exynos machines come
with physical banks without any holes, and I am thinking why not drop it
and
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:14:26PM +0100, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi Olof,
On Thursday 20 of December 2012 11:56:59 Olof Johansson wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com
wrote:
The size of memory bank should be under 256MB, because current
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
[...]
What's the actual bug caused by this? The description is vague.
The kernel panics early on NULL pointer dereference in memory
initialization.
(Cc'ed KyongHo Cho)
Yeah, correct. The size of memory bank should be under section size and
current
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
[...]
What's the actual bug caused by this? The description is vague.
The kernel panics early on NULL pointer dereference in memory
initialization.
(Cc'ed KyongHo Cho)
Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Thursday 20 of December 2012 14:19:48 Subash Patel wrote:
I would like to ask a question here. Do we need to have sparse even if
the physical memory is contiguous? All the recent exynos machines come
with physical banks without any holes, and I am thinking why not
From: Olof Johansson [mailto:o...@lixom.net]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 9:36 AM
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
[...]
What's the actual bug caused by this? The description is vague.
The kernel
26 matches
Mail list logo
