branch in the pinctrl tree.
Could you rebase it on that branch?
Or is the error not even in my tree?
This one got sent incorrectly due to my mistake. Please try the correct
version:
[PATCH RESEND 2/2] pinctrl: samsung: Fix link error with
CONFIG_PINCTRL_EXYNOS disabled
incorrectly due to my mistake. Please try the correct
version:
[PATCH RESEND 2/2] pinctrl: samsung: Fix link error with CONFIG_PINCTRL_EXYNOS
disabled
This does not apply either.
Can you please test against the devel branch in the pinctrl tree?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list
?
Or is the error not even in my tree?
This one got sent incorrectly due to my mistake. Please try the correct
version:
[PATCH RESEND 2/2] pinctrl: samsung: Fix link error with
CONFIG_PINCTRL_EXYNOS disabled
This does not apply either.
Can you please test against the devel branch
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Tomasz Figa tomasz.f...@gmail.com wrote:
Commit f67faf487 added driver data for Exynos5250, which is available
only if CONFIG_PINCTRL_EXYNOS is enabled. However probably due to merge
error, the reference to this driver data structure was located outside
of
-by: Tomasz Figa tomasz.f...@gmail.com
This does not apply to my devel branch in the pinctrl tree.
Could you rebase it on that branch?
Or is the error not even in my tree?
This one got sent incorrectly due to my mistake. Please try the correct
version:
[PATCH RESEND 2/2] pinctrl: samsung: Fix
Commit f67faf487 added driver data for Exynos5250, which is available
only if CONFIG_PINCTRL_EXYNOS is enabled. However probably due to merge
error, the reference to this driver data structure was located outside
of relevant ifdef and compiled unconditionally, leading to link error
with
