On Tuesday 13 May 2014 13:37:33 Kukjin Kim wrote:
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 22 April 2014, Olof Johansson wrote:
I don't think there's a point in keeping this around. A
single-platform config is just enabling a single platform in the
config, it's not a specific option. I don't
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 2:15 AM, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
On Tuesday 13 May 2014 13:37:33 Kukjin Kim wrote:
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 22 April 2014, Olof Johansson wrote:
I don't think there's a point in keeping this around. A
single-platform config is just enabling a
Olof Johansson wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 2:15 AM, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
On Tuesday 13 May 2014 13:37:33 Kukjin Kim wrote:
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 22 April 2014, Olof Johansson wrote:
I don't think there's a point in keeping this around. A
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 22 April 2014, Olof Johansson wrote:
I don't think there's a point in keeping this around. A
single-platform config is just enabling a single platform in the
config, it's not a specific option. I don't think any of the other
platforms use anything like
On Tuesday 22 April 2014, Olof Johansson wrote:
I don't think there's a point in keeping this around. A
single-platform config is just enabling a single platform in the
config, it's not a specific option. I don't think any of the other
platforms use anything like this today.
The only one
Hi Sachin,
On 15.04.2014 11:28, Sachin Kamat wrote:
From: Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de
This makes it possible to enable the exynos platform as part of a
multiplatform kernel, in addition to keeping the single-platform
Exynos support.
sparsemem is currently not supported in multiplatform.
Is
On Wednesday 16 April 2014 15:51:29 Tomasz Figa wrote:
On 15.04.2014 11:28, Sachin Kamat wrote:
From: Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de
This makes it possible to enable the exynos platform as part of a
multiplatform kernel, in addition to keeping the single-platform
Exynos support.
On 16.04.2014 16:31, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 16 April 2014 15:51:29 Tomasz Figa wrote:
On 15.04.2014 11:28, Sachin Kamat wrote:
From: Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de
This makes it possible to enable the exynos platform as part of a
multiplatform kernel, in addition to keeping the
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Tomasz Figa t.f...@samsung.com wrote:
On 16.04.2014 16:31, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 16 April 2014 15:51:29 Tomasz Figa wrote:
On 15.04.2014 11:28, Sachin Kamat wrote:
From: Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de
This makes it possible to enable the exynos
Hi Thomas,
On 16.04.2014 16:55, Thomas Abraham wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Tomasz Figa t.f...@samsung.com wrote:
On 16.04.2014 16:31, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 16 April 2014 15:51:29 Tomasz Figa wrote:
On 15.04.2014 11:28, Sachin Kamat wrote:
From: Arnd Bergmann
On Wednesday 16 April 2014 16:58:43 Tomasz Figa wrote:
On 16.04.2014 16:55, Thomas Abraham wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Tomasz Figa t.f...@samsung.com wrote:
On 16.04.2014 16:31, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
sparsemem is still not supported in multiplatform, but after I looked
at it
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 08:14:27PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
This patch does a partial revert of 313367e7bfa by allowing these
drivers on all samsung platforms except EXYNOS, so we can proceed
with the multiplatform patches.
If support for these drivers is actually needed on EXYNOS
On Wednesday 16 April 2014 21:50:01 Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 08:14:27PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
This patch does a partial revert of 313367e7bfa by allowing these
drivers on all samsung platforms except EXYNOS, so we can proceed
with the multiplatform patches.
If
From: Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de
This makes it possible to enable the exynos platform as part of a
multiplatform kernel, in addition to keeping the single-platform
Exynos support.
sparsemem is currently not supported in multiplatform.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de
Signed-off-by:
14 matches
Mail list logo
