Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 5/5] regulator: tps65090: Make FETs more reliable by adding retries

2014-04-29 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 08:56:05AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: An issue was discovered with tps65090 where sometimes the FETs wouldn't actually turn on when requested (they would report overcurrent). The most problematic FET was the one used for the LCD Applied, thanks. signature.asc

[RESEND PATCH v3 5/5] regulator: tps65090: Make FETs more reliable by adding retries

2014-04-23 Thread Doug Anderson
An issue was discovered with tps65090 where sometimes the FETs wouldn't actually turn on when requested (they would report overcurrent). The most problematic FET was the one used for the LCD backlight on the Samsung ARM Chromebook (FET1). Problems were especially prevalent when the device was

Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] regulator: tps65090: Make FETs more reliable by adding retries

2014-04-22 Thread Lee Jones
Mark, On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote: On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 04:12:29PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: An issue was discovered with tps65090 where sometimes the FETs wouldn't actually turn on when requested (they would report overcurrent). The most

Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] regulator: tps65090: Make FETs more reliable by adding retries

2014-04-22 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 08:47:09AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: If there are cross-subsystem dependencies I prefer to use immutable branches to eliminate any change of merge conflicts in -next or the next merge window. I'm happy to either create on with Mark's Acks, or receive a pull-request from

Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] regulator: tps65090: Make FETs more reliable by adding retries

2014-04-22 Thread Doug Anderson
Hi, On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote: If there are cross-subsystem dependencies I prefer to use immutable branches to eliminate any change of merge conflicts in -next or the next merge window. I'm happy to either create on with Mark's Acks, or receive

Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] regulator: tps65090: Make FETs more reliable by adding retries

2014-04-18 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 04:12:29PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: An issue was discovered with tps65090 where sometimes the FETs wouldn't actually turn on when requested (they would report overcurrent). The most problematic FET was the one used for the LCD This is basically fine but you said it

Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] regulator: tps65090: Make FETs more reliable by adding retries

2014-04-18 Thread Doug Anderson
Mark, On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote: On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 04:12:29PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: An issue was discovered with tps65090 where sometimes the FETs wouldn't actually turn on when requested (they would report overcurrent). The most

[PATCH v3 5/5] regulator: tps65090: Make FETs more reliable by adding retries

2014-04-16 Thread Doug Anderson
An issue was discovered with tps65090 where sometimes the FETs wouldn't actually turn on when requested (they would report overcurrent). The most problematic FET was the one used for the LCD backlight on the Samsung ARM Chromebook (FET1). Problems were especially prevalent when the device was