Hi Mark,
On Monday 23 February 2015 11:15 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
This series is extracted from [4], which is trying to remove all
traces of gic_arch_extn from the tree. As some maintainers are more
responsive than others (understatement of the year...), I've decided
to split it per sub-arch,
Hi Pakaj,
On 24/02/15 10:09, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
Hi Mark,
On Monday 23 February 2015 11:15 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
This series is extracted from [4], which is trying to remove all
traces of gic_arch_extn from the tree. As some maintainers are more
responsive than others (understatement of
Marc Zyngier wrote:
Hi Pakaj,
Hi Marc and Pankaj,
On 24/02/15 10:09, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
Hi Mark,
On Monday 23 February 2015 11:15 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
This series is extracted from [4], which is trying to remove all
traces of gic_arch_extn from the tree. As some maintainers
This series is extracted from [4], which is trying to remove all
traces of gic_arch_extn from the tree. As some maintainers are more
responsive than others (understatement of the year...), I've decided
to split it per sub-arch, and get it moving, at least partially.
This series addresses Exynos