Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] phy: Add exynos-simple-phy driver

2014-05-13 Thread Rahul Sharma
Gentle PING On 7 May 2014 21:03, Tomasz Figa t.f...@samsung.com wrote: [CCing more DT-folks :)] On 07.05.2014 16:19, Rahul Sharma wrote: On 7 May 2014 19:06, Tomasz Stanislawski t.stanisl...@samsung.com wrote: On 05/07/2014 12:38 PM, Rahul Sharma wrote: On 5 May 2014 15:14, Kishon Vijay

Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] phy: Add exynos-simple-phy driver

2014-05-07 Thread Rahul Sharma
On 5 May 2014 15:14, Kishon Vijay Abraham I kis...@ti.com wrote: Hi, On Wednesday 09 April 2014 03:31 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: Hi, On 09/04/14 11:12, Rahul Sharma wrote: Idea looks good. How about keeping compatible which is independent of SoC, something like samsung,exynos-simple-phy

Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] phy: Add exynos-simple-phy driver

2014-05-07 Thread Tomasz Stanislawski
On 05/07/2014 12:38 PM, Rahul Sharma wrote: On 5 May 2014 15:14, Kishon Vijay Abraham I kis...@ti.com wrote: Hi, On Wednesday 09 April 2014 03:31 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: Hi, On 09/04/14 11:12, Rahul Sharma wrote: Idea looks good. How about keeping compatible which is independent of

Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] phy: Add exynos-simple-phy driver

2014-05-07 Thread Rahul Sharma
On 7 May 2014 19:06, Tomasz Stanislawski t.stanisl...@samsung.com wrote: On 05/07/2014 12:38 PM, Rahul Sharma wrote: On 5 May 2014 15:14, Kishon Vijay Abraham I kis...@ti.com wrote: Hi, On Wednesday 09 April 2014 03:31 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: Hi, On 09/04/14 11:12, Rahul Sharma

Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] phy: Add exynos-simple-phy driver

2014-05-07 Thread Tomasz Figa
[CCing more DT-folks :)] On 07.05.2014 16:19, Rahul Sharma wrote: On 7 May 2014 19:06, Tomasz Stanislawski t.stanisl...@samsung.com wrote: On 05/07/2014 12:38 PM, Rahul Sharma wrote: On 5 May 2014 15:14, Kishon Vijay Abraham I kis...@ti.com wrote: Hi, On Wednesday 09 April 2014 03:31 PM,

Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] phy: Add exynos-simple-phy driver

2014-05-05 Thread Kishon Vijay Abraham I
Hi, On Wednesday 09 April 2014 03:31 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: Hi, On 09/04/14 11:12, Rahul Sharma wrote: Idea looks good. How about keeping compatible which is independent of SoC, something like samsung,exynos-simple-phy and provide Reg and Bit through phy provider node. This way we

Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] phy: Add exynos-simple-phy driver

2014-04-30 Thread Rahul Sharma
Hi Tomasz, I have tested your patches for exynos5250 and 5420. Works fine. Are you planning to post v3? If you want I can share hand with you for v3. Regards, Rahul Sharma On 9 April 2014 17:17, Andreas Oberritter o...@saftware.de wrote: Hello Andrzej, On 09.04.2014 10:37, Andrzej Hajda

Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] phy: Add exynos-simple-phy driver

2014-04-30 Thread Tomasz Stanislawski
Hi Rahul, I will prepare we v3 version. Do you want me to add your patches for exynos5?50 to the patchset? Regards, Tomasz Stanislawski On 04/30/2014 08:37 AM, Rahul Sharma wrote: Hi Tomasz, I have tested your patches for exynos5250 and 5420. Works fine. Are you planning to post v3? If you

Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] phy: Add exynos-simple-phy driver

2014-04-30 Thread Rahul Sharma
Sure (5250, 5420). I will wait for the same to update DT patches, if any. Regards, Rahul Sharma. On 30 April 2014 14:02, Tomasz Stanislawski t.stanisl...@samsung.com wrote: Hi Rahul, I will prepare we v3 version. Do you want me to add your patches for exynos5?50 to the patchset? Regards,

Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] phy: Add exynos-simple-phy driver

2014-04-09 Thread Andrzej Hajda
Hi Tomasz, On 04/08/2014 04:37 PM, Tomasz Stanislawski wrote: Add exynos-simple-phy driver to support a single register PHY interfaces present on Exynos4 SoC. Signed-off-by: Tomasz Stanislawski t.stanisl...@samsung.com --- .../devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung-phy.txt| 24 +++

Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] phy: Add exynos-simple-phy driver

2014-04-09 Thread Rahul Sharma
Hi Tomasz, On 9 April 2014 14:07, Andrzej Hajda a.ha...@samsung.com wrote: Hi Tomasz, On 04/08/2014 04:37 PM, Tomasz Stanislawski wrote: Add exynos-simple-phy driver to support a single register PHY interfaces present on Exynos4 SoC. Signed-off-by: Tomasz Stanislawski

Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] phy: Add exynos-simple-phy driver

2014-04-09 Thread Sylwester Nawrocki
Hi, On 09/04/14 11:12, Rahul Sharma wrote: Idea looks good. How about keeping compatible which is independent of SoC, something like samsung,exynos-simple-phy and provide Reg and Bit through phy provider node. This way we can avoid SoC specific hardcoding in phy driver and don't need to look

Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] phy: Add exynos-simple-phy driver

2014-04-09 Thread Tomasz Stanislawski
Hi Rahul, On 04/09/2014 11:12 AM, Rahul Sharma wrote: Hi Tomasz, On 9 April 2014 14:07, Andrzej Hajda a.ha...@samsung.com wrote: Hi Tomasz, On 04/08/2014 04:37 PM, Tomasz Stanislawski wrote: Add exynos-simple-phy driver to support a single register PHY interfaces present on Exynos4 SoC.

Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] phy: Add exynos-simple-phy driver

2014-04-09 Thread Andreas Oberritter
Hello Andrzej, On 09.04.2014 10:37, Andrzej Hajda wrote: +static int exynos_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ +const struct of_device_id *of_id = of_match_device( +of_match_ptr(exynos_phy_of_match), pdev-dev); +const u32 *offsets = of_id-data; +int count; +

[PATCHv2 1/3] phy: Add exynos-simple-phy driver

2014-04-08 Thread Tomasz Stanislawski
Add exynos-simple-phy driver to support a single register PHY interfaces present on Exynos4 SoC. Signed-off-by: Tomasz Stanislawski t.stanisl...@samsung.com --- .../devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung-phy.txt| 24 +++ drivers/phy/Kconfig|5 +