On 24.11.2015 08:29, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 07:40:41PM +0530, Saurabh Sengar wrote:
>> use of_property_read_u8() for u8 variables,
>> also changed the return type to void as this function return type
>> is nowhere used.
>>
>
> I would be good if you could split both
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 07:40:41PM +0530, Saurabh Sengar wrote:
> use of_property_read_u8() for u8 variables,
> also changed the return type to void as this function return type
> is nowhere used.
>
I would be good if you could split both changes into two patches.
Also, I still do not