Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] [media] handle 64-bit time_t in v4l2_buffer

2015-09-18 Thread Hans Verkuil
On 09/18/15 11:26, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 18 September 2015 09:18:45 Hans Verkuil wrote: >> Hi Arnd, >> >> Thanks once again for working on this! Unfortunately, this approach won't >> work, see my comments below. >> >> BTW, I would expect to see compile errors when compiling for 32 bit.

Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] [media] handle 64-bit time_t in v4l2_buffer

2015-09-18 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday 18 September 2015 09:18:45 Hans Verkuil wrote: > Hi Arnd, > > Thanks once again for working on this! Unfortunately, this approach won't > work, see my comments below. > > BTW, I would expect to see compile errors when compiling for 32 bit. Did > you try that? I only tested on 32-bit,

Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] [media] handle 64-bit time_t in v4l2_buffer

2015-09-18 Thread Hans Verkuil
Hi Arnd, Thanks once again for working on this! Unfortunately, this approach won't work, see my comments below. BTW, I would expect to see compile errors when compiling for 32 bit. Did you try that? On 09/17/2015 11:19 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > This is the final change to enable user space

Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] [media] handle 64-bit time_t in v4l2_buffer

2015-09-18 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday 18 September 2015 11:49:50 Hans Verkuil wrote: > *If* the conversion takes place only in v4l2-ioctl.c, then it makes sense > have these structs + ioctls moved to v4l2-ioctl.h. Ok. > I noticed that v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c wasn't changed. Is that right? I have > unfortunately no time to