Dan Jones wrote:
Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
...
My impression is that no error recovery is being tried
for transient failures. Could someone confirm this?
If this is correct, what changes are need to be made
to correct the problem?
Well, as I imagine you already know, your basic
OK, what about a compromise.
The fundamental problem that we all agree on is that SCSI devices are detected
in the order that the mid-layer hosts.c file calls their detect routines.
Further, for multiple cards of the same type, the detection order is up to the
individual driver. A different
"J . A . Magallon" wrote:
Average users you are targetting with that automagical
card detection even do not know there are SCSI and IDE disks. They just
want a 30Gb ide disk to install linux and play. If they involve with SCSI
and ID numbers and multiple cards and so on they can read some
Michael Meissner wrote:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 12:32:05AM +0100, J . A . Magallon wrote:
If that is your idea of the average user... You're a system administrator,
you can have tons of scsi cards in your system if you want.
You want to make things SOOO easy for a 'dummy' user, and
There has been discussion recently on the linux-scsi list about devices
being put offline incorrectly. There is such a problem with error
handling in v2.4.0 (and v2.2.18) for low-level drivers that use the new
error handling. The SCSI mid-level new error handling incorrectly puts
devices offline
5 matches
Mail list logo
