Re: Fw: Kernel panic with dc395x in 2.6.12.2

2005-07-22 Thread randy_dunlap
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 01:51:34 +0200 Pierre Ossman wrote: I have now tried with highmem disabled and the driver still crashes. See the following image: http://craffe.se/dc395x_kernel_bug.jpg Hi Pierre, Does this happen on every boot? Please send your .config file (or put it on craffe.se).

Re: lsscsi-0.15 released

2005-07-22 Thread Douglas Gilbert
Martin Peschke3 wrote: Doug, Providing udev names is great. Makes it more user-frendly. Martin, It can still be tricked: for example putting disk device nodes in a /dev/disks/ directory. Also the udevinfo approach could be tricked by using mknod . Btw., what do you think about this idea: If

Re: Fw: Kernel panic with dc395x in 2.6.12.2

2005-07-22 Thread Pierre Ossman
randy_dunlap wrote: Does this happen on every boot? Yup Please send your .config file (or put it on craffe.se). Included Does this happen with othe kernel versions? Not that I've found. I could try compiling the currently running kernel (2.6.11.7) without highmem if you'd like.

Re: Fw: Kernel panic with dc395x in 2.6.12.2

2005-07-22 Thread Pierre Ossman
I'm having some problems with your mailserver Randy. I'll cc the mailing list hoping you'll see this there. I get: 550-Verification failed for [EMAIL PROTECTED] 550-unrouteable mail domain drzeus.cx 550 Sender verify failed As far as i know my MX records are completely correct. Rgds

ServeRAID V7.12

2005-07-22 Thread Hammer, Jack
IBM and Adaptec have successfully exited test for Version 7.12.02 of ServeRAID. No functional changes were required of the ips driver. This patch brings the 2.6 kernel driver up to the same ( common for 2.4 2.6 ) source supported by IBM. Most of the patch is just updating IBM's version

[Patch 0/2] Update aic79xx

2005-07-22 Thread Hannes Reinecke
Hi James, I've finished the update of aic79xx to make use of the scsi_transport_spi infrastructure. The first patch is actually jgarzik's one, with some additions to make it work :-) The second patch is the integration proper. patch made a mess of it, however, so better to compare the files by

[PATCH 1/2] aic79xx update

2005-07-22 Thread Hannes Reinecke
This patch removes the busyq from aic79xx, using the midlayer queue instead. Re-worked patch from Jeff Garzik. Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE Linux Products GmbHS390 zSeries Maxfeldstraße 5 +49 911 74053

Re: ServeRAID V7.12

2005-07-22 Thread Arjan van de Ven
--- a/drivers/scsi/ips.c Tue Jul 19 13:15:24 2005 +++ b/drivers/scsi/ips.c Tue Jul 19 13:12:44 2005 @@ -133,10 +133,12 @@ #ifdef MODULE static char *ips = NULL; -module_param(ips, charp, 0); +#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE KERNEL_VERSION(2,4,25) +MODULE_PARM(ips, s); +#else

Re: [Patch 0/2] Update aic79xx

2005-07-22 Thread Jeff Garzik
Hannes Reinecke wrote: Hi James, I've finished the update of aic79xx to make use of the scsi_transport_spi infrastructure. The first patch is actually jgarzik's one, with some additions to make it work :-) The second patch is the integration proper. patch made a mess of it, however, so better

Re: [Patch 0/2] Update aic79xx

2005-07-22 Thread James Bottomley
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 16:40 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: I've finished the update of aic79xx to make use of the scsi_transport_spi infrastructure. The first patch is actually jgarzik's one, with some additions to make it work :-) The second patch is the integration proper. patch made a mess

Is it possible to support a sector size 8192

2005-07-22 Thread Johann Hanne
Hi everybody, i'm trying to access UDO/WORM mediums (which have a sector size of 8192) via a Plasmon UDO drive, but all I get is unsupported sector size 8192 when I try to access it via /dev/sdX. drivers/scsi/sd.c suggests that the maximum sector size currently supported by Linux is 4096. How

Re: Is it possible to support a sector size 8192

2005-07-22 Thread Steve McIntyre
Johann wrote: Hi everybody, i'm trying to access UDO/WORM mediums (which have a sector size of 8192) via a Plasmon UDO drive, but all I get is unsupported sector size 8192 when I try to access it via /dev/sdX. drivers/scsi/sd.c suggests that the maximum sector size currently supported by Linux is

Re: Is it possible to support a sector size 8192

2005-07-22 Thread Christian Iversen
On Friday 22 July 2005 20:18, Steve McIntyre wrote: Johann wrote: Hi everybody, i'm trying to access UDO/WORM mediums (which have a sector size of 8192) via a Plasmon UDO drive, but all I get is unsupported sector size 8192 when I try to access it via /dev/sdX. drivers/scsi/sd.c suggests

[PATCH] drivers/scsi/st.c: add command and sense history

2005-07-22 Thread Andy Stevens
Hello SCSI tapers, Attached is a patch to add some functionality the st driver so that you can monitor the most recent SCSI command and sense buffer. This info is made available via sysfs attributes. I want to add these attributes in order to do better error processing in some custom tape

Re: Is it possible to support a sector size 8192

2005-07-22 Thread Bryan Henderson
we've started shipping a userland filesystem driver for UDO based on FUSE. How does the userland filesystem driver talk to the device? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-scsi in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at