While working on bidi support at struct request level
I have found that blk_queue_activity_fn is actually never used.
The only user is in ide-probe.c with this code:
/* enable led activity for disk drives only */
if (drive-media == ide_disk hwif-led_act)
On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 16:59 -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
It turns out that libata has already dma_map_sg'd the scatterlist
entries that go with an ata_queued_cmd by the time it calls
sas_ata_qc_issue. sas_ata_qc_issue passes this scatterlist to aic94xx.
Unfortunately, aic94xx assumes that
Simple patch to add the new PCIe version of the 29320 card.
Signed-off: Mark Salyzyn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ASC-29320LPE.patch
Description: ASC-29320LPE.patch
I decided to do this by email instead of bugzilla so that it would be
visible to everyone on the linux-scsi mailing list.
Re: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7026
To recap: Joerg Schilling needs to be able to retrieve the max_sectors
value for a SCSI device's request queue. Doing
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 15:52 -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
I decided to do this by email instead of bugzilla so that it would be
visible to everyone on the linux-scsi mailing list.
Re: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7026
To recap: Joerg Schilling needs to be able to retrieve the
Alan Stern wrote:
I decided to do this by email instead of bugzilla so that it would be
visible to everyone on the linux-scsi mailing list.
Re: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7026
To recap: Joerg Schilling needs to be able to retrieve the max_sectors
value for a SCSI device's
Alan Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I decided to do this by email instead of bugzilla so that it would be
visible to everyone on the linux-scsi mailing list.
Thank you, this is a more convenient way of having a discussion.
Re: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7026
To recap:
On Thursday 09 November 2006 16:59, Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
On Thursday 09 November 2006 16:40, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 08:37:23AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
00:10.0 Mass storage controller [0180]: Silicon Image, Inc. Unknown
device [1095:2502] (rev 01)
James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the patch below acceptable?
Really, no. The parameter you're fishing for is a block parameter, not
a SCSI parameter ... it should really be a block ioctl if we have to
have an ioctl at all.
I am afraid, you seem to missunderstand things.
This
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 23:46 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
I am afraid, you seem to missunderstand things.
This parameter is not related to something you may call block layer, it is
rather related to the low level SCSI transport. If the value is stored in a
higher layer, it is not stored in
Alan Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I decided to do this by email instead of bugzilla so that it would be
visible to everyone on the linux-scsi mailing list.
Re: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7026
I just put out preliminary support for this ioctl.
Please check:
Douglas Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW Joerg: SG_SET_RESERVED_SIZE simply makes it extremely
unlikely that the sg driver will not be able to fetch
enough memory from the kernel to move data associated with
a SCSI command. The block layer SG_IO just fudges that.
While a major concern in
James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 23:46 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
I am afraid, you seem to missunderstand things.
This parameter is not related to something you may call block layer, it
is
rather related to the low level SCSI transport. If the value
Luben Tuikov wrote:
...snip...
This statement in scsi_io_completion() causes the infinite retry loop:
if (scsi_end_request(cmd, 1, good_bytes, !!result) == NULL)
return;
The code in 2.6.19 is result==0, not !!result, which is logically
the same as result!=0. Did you mean to
James Bottomley wrote:
Rather than introduce an extra flag, I think we can key of the protocol
flag: libata is the only thing that initiates STP tasks. How does this
look?
ACK.
--D
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-scsi in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
This is quite a mixed bag. The usual driver updates, plus asynchronous
scanning and the new target infrastructure.
The patch is available here:
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-misc-2.6.git
the shortlog is:
Adrian Bunk:
ipr: Make ipr_ioctl static
--- Michael Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luben Tuikov wrote:
...snip...
This statement in scsi_io_completion() causes the infinite retry loop:
if (scsi_end_request(cmd, 1, good_bytes, !!result) == NULL)
return;
The code in 2.6.19 is result==0, not !!result, which is
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 21:00:20 -0800 (PST) Luben Tuikov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Michael Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luben Tuikov wrote:
...snip...
This statement in scsi_io_completion() causes the infinite retry loop:
if (scsi_end_request(cmd, 1, good_bytes, !!result) == NULL)
--- Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 21:00:20 -0800 (PST) Luben Tuikov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Michael Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luben Tuikov wrote:
...snip...
This statement in scsi_io_completion() causes the infinite retry loop:
if
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 10:12:17PM -0700, Grant Grundler wrote:
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 09:38:00AM +0900, Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
Grant Grundler wrote:
Hidetoshi,
I have a nearly finished rewrite of Documentation/pci.txt.
Can you drop this patch for now on my promise to integrate
your
From: Dominik Brodowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 21:49:27 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] pcmcia: conf.ConfigBase and conf.Present consolidation
struct pcmcia_device *p_dev-conf.ConfigBase and .Present are set in almost
all PCMICA driver right at the beginning, using the same calls but
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 09:17:16PM -0500, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
From: Dominik Brodowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 21:49:27 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] pcmcia: conf.ConfigBase and conf.Present consolidation
struct pcmcia_device *p_dev-conf.ConfigBase and .Present are set in
22 matches
Mail list logo
