Re: [PATCH] scsi_debug: illegal blocking memory allocation

2007-01-04 Thread James Bottomley
On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 12:21 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: I guess it's fully up to you how you want to solve it. The scheme seems a little elaborate, but these error conditions are unlikely to ever been seen in the wild, so no objections from me. Actually, there's already a DID_ code that does what

Re: [PATCH] scsi_debug: illegal blocking memory allocation

2007-01-04 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 09:10:01AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote: On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 12:21 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: I guess it's fully up to you how you want to solve it. The scheme seems a little elaborate, but these error conditions are unlikely to ever been seen in the wild, so no

Re: [PATCH] scsi_debug: illegal blocking memory allocation

2007-01-04 Thread James Bottomley
On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 08:27 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: Any returning command, or a returning command from this device? This device We may be out of memory from a different device, and this may be the only command being sent to the scsi_debug driver. Wouldn't we end up halting the

Re: [PATCH] SCSI, libata: add support for ATA_16 commands to libata ATAPI devices

2007-01-04 Thread Mark Lord
Jens Axboe wrote: On Wed, Jan 03 2007, James Bottomley wrote: Er, well, as you know, I've never been a fan of this static list. I thought Jens was going to put us all out of our misery by making the list settable per device by root and thus shovel the problem off onto the distros? The code

Re: [PATCH] SCSI, libata: add support for ATA_16 commands to libata ATAPI devices

2007-01-04 Thread Jens Axboe
On Thu, Jan 04 2007, Mark Lord wrote: Jens Axboe wrote: On Wed, Jan 03 2007, James Bottomley wrote: Er, well, as you know, I've never been a fan of this static list. I thought Jens was going to put us all out of our misery by making the list settable per device by root and thus shovel the

Re: 2.6.20-rc3: known unfixed regressions (v3)

2007-01-04 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 06:46:32PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: Subject: SPARC64: Can't mount / (CONFIG_SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC=y ?) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/13/181 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/01/04/75 Submitter : Horst H. von Brand [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status :

[RFC: 2.6 patch] remove the broken SCSI_AMIGA7XX driver

2007-01-04 Thread Adrian Bunk
The SCSI_AMIGA7XX driver: - has been marked as BROKEN for more than two years and - is still marked as BROKEN. Drivers that had been marked as BROKEN for such a long time seem to be unlikely to be revived in the forseeable future. But if anyone wants to ever revive this driver, the code is still

Re: PROBLEM: LSIFC909 mpt card fails to recognize devices

2007-01-04 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 19:06:46 -0500 Justin Rosander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please forward this to the appropriate maintainer. Thank you. [1.] One line summary of the problem:My fibre channel drives fail to be recognized by my LSIFC909 card. Please send the output of `lspci -vn' - To

[PATCH 1/1] 3ware 8000 serialize reset code

2007-01-04 Thread adam radford
The attached patch for scsi-misc-2.6 updates the 3ware 8000 driver: - Free irq handler in __tw_shutdown(). - Turn on RCD bit for caching mode page. - Serialize reset code. Signed-off-by: Adam Radford [EMAIL PROTECTED] James, Please apply Thanks! -Adam Note: The patch is attached as an

RE: megaraid_sas xscale interrupt mask?

2007-01-04 Thread Patro, Sumant
Hello Joe, The mask value 0x1f is to mask out interrupts. The value in the current kernel code is appropriate for all controllers that the driver supports. Are you seeing any specific issue in driver with this mask value? Regards, Sumant -Original Message-

[PATCH 1/5] fusion: fibre channel: return DID_ERROR for MPI_IOCSTATUS_SCSI_IOC_TERMINATED

2007-01-04 Thread Eric Moore
A repost of a patch forwarded by Mikael Reed from 2006-12-20. The fibre channel IOC may kill a request for a variety of reasons, some of which may be recovered by a retry, some of which are unlikely to be recovered. Return DID_ERROR instead of DID_RESET to permit retry of the command, just not

[PATCH 2/5] fusion: vmware bug fix prevent inifinite retries

2007-01-04 Thread Eric Moore
Simialar to the previous bug fix, this patch avoids inifinite retries. This is replicated in Vmware environment when the guest OS is using the 53c1030 as a emulated storage controller. This patch will restore original driver behavior for SPI from about a year ago, though keeping same behavor for

[PATCH 3/5] fusion: power pc and miscellaneous bug fixs

2007-01-04 Thread Eric Moore
* Endian fix's for warnings found in ppc environment. * Fix compile time warning when calling scsi_device_reprobe, where in newer kernels this API expects its return value to be examined. * Fix compile errors when debug messages are enabled. Signed-off-by: Eric Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff

[PATCH 4/5] fusion: MODULE_VERSION support

2007-01-04 Thread Eric Moore
* Add modinfo driver version support. * Change copyright year to 2007. Signed-off-by: Eric Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -uarpN b/drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c a/drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c --- b/drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c 2006-12-23 21:00:32.0 -0700 +++

[PATCH 5/6] fusion: bump version

2007-01-04 Thread Eric Moore
bump version Signed-off-by: Eric Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -uarpN b/drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.h a/drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.h --- b/drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.h 2006-12-25 01:41:05.0 -0700 +++ a/drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.h 2006-12-25 01:45:41.0 -0700 @@

[PATCH] scsi_debug error processing

2007-01-04 Thread Douglas Gilbert
:49:33.0 -0500 @@ -51,10 +51,10 @@ #include scsi_logging.h #include scsi_debug.h -#define SCSI_DEBUG_VERSION 1.80 -static const char * scsi_debug_version_date = 20061018; +#define SCSI_DEBUG_VERSION 1.81 +static const char * scsi_debug_version_date = 20070104; -/* Additional Sense Code

Re: [PATCH] scsi_debug: illegal blocking memory allocation

2007-01-04 Thread Douglas Gilbert
Jens Axboe wrote: On Thu, Jan 04 2007, James Bottomley wrote: On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 12:21 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: I guess it's fully up to you how you want to solve it. The scheme seems a little elaborate, but these error conditions are unlikely to ever been seen in the wild, so no

Re: PROBLEM: LSIFC909 mpt card fails to recognize devices

2007-01-04 Thread Eric Moore
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 04:59:22PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 19:06:46 -0500 Justin Rosander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please forward this to the appropriate maintainer. Thank you. [1.] One line summary of the problem:My fibre channel drives fail to be

2.6.20-rc3: known unfixed regressions (v3)

2007-01-04 Thread Adrian Bunk
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc3 compared to 2.6.19 that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree. If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch of you caused a breakage or I'm