On Wed, Jan 24 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
From: Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add bsg queue resize
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:23:49 +0100
On Tue, Jan 23 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Sat, Jan 20 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
This enables bsg to resize the queue depth
Douglas Gilbert wrote:
Aboo Valappil wrote:
Hi Stefan Richter,
Thanks everyone for their advice on this. As per your advice, I did the
following when the last user space target serving the scsi_host quits,
the queue command will do the following on the new commands coming through.
Stefan Richter wrote:
Randy Dunlap wrote:
Aboo Valappil wrote:
The new version is available http://vscsihba.aboo.org/vscsihbav204.gz
404: NOT FOUND
.gz - .tgz
Besides the tarball, a browsable source tree would be nice for people
who just want to take a quick look.
On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 05:49 +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
+ if ((scsicmd-cmnd[0] == INQUIRY) (expose_physicals = 0)) {
+ u8 b;
+ u8 b1;
+ /* We can't expose disk devices because we can't
+* tell
On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 08:31 -0800, Mark Haverkamp wrote:
The other patches still apply with this one removed (One applies with
fuzz). Is that OK or should I re-diff and resend them.
That should be fine ... I get large numbers of patches that either apply
with fuzz or even have rejects.
James
From: Greg Tucker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The interprocessor messaging unit supports mailbox style communication
between the two Xscale cores on iop342.
Signed-off-by: Greg Tucker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
arch/arm/mach-iop13xx/Kconfig |
The imu (inter-processor messaging unit) on the iop13xx enables mailbox
style communication between the two cores on iop13xx. Greg Tucker has
has wrapped this capability in a scsi driver which allows Linux to
interface with the other core as if it were a scsi disk target. I would
like to submit
From: Greg Tucker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enable Linux to access the other core as if it were a scsi target.
Signed-off-by: Greg Tucker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
arch/arm/mach-iop13xx/imu/Kconfig |7
drivers/scsi/Makefile |1
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 11:19 -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
Back in December you wrote a patch to expose the queue ioctls, and sent it
(off-list) to Jens Axboe and to me. Jens spproved it, but then it
disappeared and was never applied. Unfortunately I
How 'bout a comment in scsh_host.h indicating that the pointer will be NULL
unless
initialized by the driver?
Protect shared block queue tag is unique to stex. Perhaps have no comment on
the variable declaration in scsi_host.h and explain why you use it in stex.
Mike
Ed Lin wrote:
The block
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 16:53 -0800, Ed Lin wrote:
The block layer uses lock to protect request queue. Every scsi device
has a unique request queue, and queue lock is the default lock in struct
request_queue. This is good for normal cases. But for a host with
shared queue tag (e.g. stex
-Original Message-
From: Michael Reed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 7:59 AM
To: Ed Lin
Cc: linux-scsi; linux-kernel; james.Bottomley; jeff; Promise_Linux
Subject: Re: [patch] scsi: use lock per host instead of per
device for shared queue tag host
It seems another driver(qla4xxx) is also using shared queue tag.
It is natural to imagine there might be same symptom in that
driver. But I don't know the driver and have no hardware so I
can not say anything certain about it.
qla4xxx implements slightly differently, in the sense we don't
-Original Message-
From: David Somayajulu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:03 PM
To: Ed Lin; Michael Reed
Cc: linux-scsi; linux-kernel; james.Bottomley; jeff;
Promise_Linux; Jens Axboe
Subject: RE: [patch] scsi: use lock per host instead of per
-Original Message-
From: James Bottomley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 9:00 AM
To: Ed Lin
Cc: linux-scsi; linux-kernel; jeff; Promise_Linux
Subject: Re: [patch] scsi: use lock per host instead of per
device forshared queue tag host
...
This
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:07:20 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7864
Summary: A MTIOCTOP/MTWEOF within the early warning will cause
the file number to be incorrect
Kernel Version: 2.6.19.2
Status: NEW
Fine by me.
Acked-By: David Howells [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-scsi in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
17 matches
Mail list logo
