On Wed, Jun 20 2007, Rene Herman wrote:
> On 06/20/2007 02:24 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Jun 20 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >>On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 01:53:32PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>
> >>> drivers/cdrom/aztcd.c
> >>> drivers/cdrom/cm206.c
> >>> drivers/cdrom/gscd.c
> >>> drive
Salyzyn, Mark wrote:
> Updated patch to address overlap with patches introduced by FUJITA
> Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Tejun, please inspect.
I'm sorry but this patch is really out of my hand. James?
--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body
On 06/20/2007 02:24 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 01:53:32PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
drivers/cdrom/aztcd.c
drivers/cdrom/cm206.c
drivers/cdrom/gscd.c
drivers/cdrom/mcdx.c
drivers/cdrom/optcd.c
drivers/cdrom/sjcd.c
These
Enable Aggressive Link Power management for AHCI controllers.
This patch will set the correct bits to turn on Aggressive
Link Power Management (ALPM) for the ahci driver. This
will cause the controller and disk to negotiate a lower
power state for the link when there is no activity (see
the AHCI
Enable link power management for ata drivers
libata drivers can define a function (enable_pm) that will
perform hardware specific actions to enable whatever power
management policy the user set up from the scsi sysfs
interface if the driver supports it. This power management
policy will be acti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Jun 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Hello
>>
>> I'm seeing very slow writes on a Dell Precision 690 with the Dell SAS5
>> adapter, serving a RAID1 array of SATA-II disks.
>>
>> It's very similar to the problem in FreeBSD, described here:
>>
>> http://unix.
There was some overlap with another patch (?) this one has not shown in
scsi-pending-2.6. Modernized to apply cleanly and did some extra
cleanup.
This attached patch is against current scsi-misc-2.6
ObligatoryDisclaimer: Please accept my condolences regarding Outlook's
handling of patch attachmen
Updated patch to address overlap with patches introduced by FUJITA
Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Tejun, please inspect.
This attached aacraid specific portion of the patch is against current
scsi-misc-2.6.
ObligatoryDisclaimer: Please accept my condolences regarding Outlook's
handling of patch co
From: Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bsg: fix the deadlock on discarding done commands
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 17:20:49 +0200
> On Sat, Jun 09 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > I'll submit the bsg bidi patches shortly.
>
> Great - I see them, will review and integrate next week.
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 02:24:09PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > These are old cdrom drivers that are broken in various ways and probably
> > should be killed off aswell.
>
> I agree (with both sentiments), would anyone mind if I just killed them
> off? mitsumi support is being reworked, that can g
On Wed, Jun 20 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 01:53:32PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> > Jens Axboe wrote:
> > >
> > > If you look at most of the code, it's inside ifdef debug statements or
> > > comments most of them. So I don't think you can base any removal
> > > sugges
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 01:53:32PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> >
> > If you look at most of the code, it's inside ifdef debug statements or
> > comments most of them. So I don't think you can base any removal
> > suggestion on that.
> >
> > The patch itself looks fine though,
On Wed, Jun 20 2007, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>
> - I have unearthed very old bugs in stale drivers that still
>used request->cmd as a READ|WRITE int
> - This patch is maybe a proof that these drivers have not been
>used for a long time. Should they be removed completely?
Applies fine now, t
- I have unearthed very old bugs in stale drivers that still
used request->cmd as a READ|WRITE int
- This patch is maybe a proof that these drivers have not been
used for a long time. Should they be removed completely?
Drivers that currently do not work for sure:
drivers/acorn/block/fd17
Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20 2007, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> If you look at most of the code, it's inside ifdef debug statements or
>>> comments most of them. So I don't think you can base any removal
>>> suggestion on that.
>>>
>>> The patch itself looks fine though, if yo
On Wed, Jun 20 2007, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> >
> > If you look at most of the code, it's inside ifdef debug statements or
> > comments most of them. So I don't think you can base any removal
> > suggestion on that.
> >
> > The patch itself looks fine though, if you send one that
Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> If you look at most of the code, it's inside ifdef debug statements or
> comments most of them. So I don't think you can base any removal
> suggestion on that.
>
> The patch itself looks fine though, if you send one that isn't mangled
> I'll apply it to the 2.6.23 branch.
>
17 matches
Mail list logo