Albert Lee wrote:
Vasily Averin wrote:
I've noticed that some scsi commands for DVD-drive attached to pata_via
successfully finishes without any delays but reports about TIMEOUT
condition. It
happens because of ATA_ERR bit is set in status register. As result for
each
command Error
Vasily Averin wrote:
Albert Lee wrote:
Vasily Averin wrote:
I've noticed that some scsi commands for DVD-drive attached to pata_via
successfully finishes without any delays but reports about TIMEOUT
condition. It
happens because of ATA_ERR bit is set in status register. As result for
each
James Bottomley wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 17:01 +0300, Benny Halevy wrote:
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
I should have said that, was the approach to use separate buffer for
sglists instead of putting the sglists and the parameters in one
buffer completely rejected?
I think that James should be
I have a very serious and stupid bug in this patch
which did not show in my tests. Please forgive me.
Below is a diff of the bug. As an answer to this mail
I will resend 2 revised patches AB1, and A2 is also affected.
Sorry
Boaz
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
From: Benny Halevy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET 0/5] Peaceful co-existence of scsi_sgtable and Large IO
sg-chaining
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:26:44 +0300
However, I'm perfectly happy to go with whatever the empirical evidence
says is best .. and hopefully, now we don't have to
As proposed by James Bottomley all I/O members of struc scsi_cmnd
and the resid member, which need to be duplicated for bidirectional
transfers. Can be allocated together with the sg-list they are
pointing to. This way when bidi comes the all structure can be duplicated
with minimal
- The code Automatically calculates at compile time the
maximum size sg-array that will fit in a memory-page and will allocate
pools of BASE_2 size, up to that maximum size.
- split scsi_alloc() into an helper scsi_sgtable_index() that will return
the index of the pool for a given
scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.h uses struct mutex, so while
linux/mutex.h seems to be pulled in indirectly
by one of the headers it includes, the right thing
is to include linux/mutex.h directly.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
diff --git
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 16:42 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Vasily Averin wrote:
Albert Lee wrote:
Vasily Averin wrote:
I've noticed that some scsi commands for DVD-drive attached to pata_via
successfully finishes without any delays but reports about TIMEOUT
condition. It
happens because of
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.h uses struct mutex, so while
linux/mutex.h seems to be pulled in indirectly
by one of the headers it includes, the right thing
is to include linux/mutex.h directly.
Is that part about always including the header directly right? If so
then
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
From: Benny Halevy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET 0/5] Peaceful co-existence of scsi_sgtable and Large
IO sg-chaining
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:26:44 +0300
However, I'm perfectly happy to go with whatever the empirical evidence
says is best .. and
Quoting Mike Christie [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: Re: [PATCH trivial] include linux/mutex.h from scsi_transport_iscsi.h
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.h uses struct mutex, so while
linux/mutex.h seems to be pulled in indirectly
by one of the headers it includes, the
Comments about this patch embedded inside
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
I've attached the sgtable patch for review. It's against the
sglist-arch branch in Jens' tree.
---
From: FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PATCH] move all the I/O descriptors to a new scsi_sgtable structure
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
From: Benny Halevy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET 0/5] Peaceful co-existence of scsi_sgtable and Large
IO sg-chaining
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:26:44 +0300
However, I'm perfectly happy to go with whatever the empirical evidence
says is best .. and
On Tuesday, July 24, 2007 6:48 PM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
I hadn't enabled bsg support in the linux kernel, that was
my problem.
What do you mean? You might hit the bug that you can't build scsi as a
modular. It was fixed before rc1.
The issue is I'm new to BSG, and I didn't know I
Resending this since all I'm getting is silence and it's quite a problem for
this box. I did a few google searches and aparently I'm not the only
one having this problem - I see reports going back for years, but no
solutions.
I've got heaps of dmesg output if wanted/needed, I'll test patches,
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 05:36:56PM +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
Of the machines we test releases on automatically this only compiles on
NUMA-Q and does not boot there (some PCI issue).
ppc64 (beavis):
drivers/built-in.o(.text+0xd2784): In function `.srp_rport_add':
: undefined reference
17 matches
Mail list logo
