On Thursday 27 December 2007 13:09:27 FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 11:27:40 +1100
Rusty Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are many signs through the code that it needs a great deal of
work: what is the purpose of sg_break? Why does the code check if
kmap_atomic fails?
Mike, what's going on? I definitely told you last time I
looked at this patch that it is a bug to call
sysfs_remove_group() under spinlock, because
sysfs_remove_group() takes sleeping locks. Yet here it is again.
Maybe you lost my email. It is here:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/20/77
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 11:15:37 +0530
Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 10:08:25 +0530
Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 10:18:50 +0530
Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
I
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 13:05:39 +0530
Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
[snip]
Thanks,
Can you try this?
diff --git a/lib/iommu-helper.c b/lib/iommu-helper.c
index e7d8544..495575a 100644
--- a/lib/iommu-helper.c
+++ b/lib/iommu-helper.c
@@ -8,15
4 matches
Mail list logo