On 09/11/12 01:38, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 08:57:10AM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
Also, as far as I can see the functions that can insert a request into
the queue (blk_insert_cloned_request(), queue_unplugged(),
blk_execute_rq_nowait()) all check whether the queue is dead
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:45:51PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
On Monday 10 September 2012 17:16:22 Aaron Lu wrote:
+static int sr_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct scsi_cd *cd;
+ struct scsi_sense_hdr sshdr;
+
+ cd = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+ if
On Tuesday 11 September 2012 14:44:30 Aaron Lu wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:45:51PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
On Monday 10 September 2012 17:16:22 Aaron Lu wrote:
+static int sr_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct scsi_cd *cd;
+ struct scsi_sense_hdr sshdr;
+
+ cd
This is the initial submission of the Chelsio FCoE offload driver (csiostor)
to the upstream kernel. This driver currently supports FCoE offload
functionality over Chelsio T4-based 10Gb Converged Network Adapters.
The following patches contain the driver sources for csiostor driver and
updates to
This patch contains the second set of the header files for csiostor driver.
Signed-off-by: Naresh Kumar Inna nar...@chelsio.com
---
drivers/scsi/csiostor/csio_lnode.h | 255 ++
drivers/scsi/csiostor/csio_mb.h| 278 +++
drivers/scsi/csiostor/csio_rnode.h |
This patch contains minor fixes to make cxgb4vf driver work with the updates to
shared firmware/hardware header files.
Signed-off-by: Naresh Kumar Inna nar...@chelsio.com
---
drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4vf/sge.c | 11 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff
This patch contains updates to firmware/hardware header files shared
between csiostor and cxgb4/cxgb4vf, and the resulting changes to the cxgb4
source files.
Signed-off-by: Naresh Kumar Inna nar...@chelsio.com
---
drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_main.c |2 +-
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:55:44AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
On Tuesday 11 September 2012 14:44:30 Aaron Lu wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:45:51PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
On Monday 10 September 2012 17:16:22 Aaron Lu wrote:
+static int sr_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
On Tuesday 11 September 2012 17:24:13 Aaron Lu wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:55:44AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
On Tuesday 11 September 2012 14:44:30 Aaron Lu wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:45:51PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
On Monday 10 September 2012 17:16:22 Aaron Lu wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:30:35AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
On Tuesday 11 September 2012 17:24:13 Aaron Lu wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:55:44AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
On Tuesday 11 September 2012 14:44:30 Aaron Lu wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:45:51PM +0200, Oliver
On Tuesday 11 September 2012 19:11:08 Aaron Lu wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:30:35AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
On Tuesday 11 September 2012 17:24:13 Aaron Lu wrote:
Yes, but because the whole system had been suspended.
In that case you can have a locked door.
By locked, do you
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:30:35AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
On Tuesday 11 September 2012 17:24:13 Aaron Lu wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:55:44AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
On Tuesday 11 September 2012 14:44:30 Aaron Lu wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:45:51PM +0200, Oliver
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 02:10:18PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
On Tuesday 11 September 2012 19:11:08 Aaron Lu wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:30:35AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
On Tuesday 11 September 2012 17:24:13 Aaron Lu wrote:
Yes, but because the whole system had been suspended.
Hi James
What are you going to do with the following four ISCI patches from isci-for-3.6
tag?:
6734092e66011def7875bd67beef889d0fee1cc9isci: add a couple __iomem
annotations
67787c330762eb884bf8c169fe942263d55ec162isci: make function declaration
match implementation
On Tuesday 11 September 2012 20:31:17 Aaron Lu wrote:
OK, I think I got your meaning.
For a simpler scenario:
1 User application did an ioctl to lock the door of the ODD when there
is no medium inside(but why? :-);
2 The ODD is runtime suspended;
3 The ODD is runtime powered off;
4 User
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 12:29 +, Dorau, Lukasz wrote:
Hi James
What are you going to do with the following four ISCI patches from
isci-for-3.6 tag?:
6734092e66011def7875bd67beef889d0fee1cc9isci: add a couple __iomem
annotations
67787c330762eb884bf8c169fe942263d55ec162isci:
[Originally posted to fedora-general, where Alan Cox suspected a usb
issue and suggested linux-usb; they suggested linux-scsi.]
F17 with current updates gets the sector count wrong (too large by 5)
for my SSD (Jetflash USB), resulting in read errors (during boot, fdisk
reading the disk etc.) for
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 06:30:01PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
These commands cannot be issued right now without giving CAP_SYS_RAWIO to
the process who wishes to send them. These commands can be useful also to
non-privileged programs who have access to the block devices. For example
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Robert Love robert.w.l...@intel.com wrote:
The following series implements a move from using module parameters
as control interfaces to /sys/bus/fcoe based interfaces. A sysfs
infrastructure
was added to the kernel a few cycles ago, this series builds on that
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Bhanu Prakash Gollapudi
bprak...@broadcom.com wrote:
I'm concerned that we will be breaking user space compatibility with this
change, as there should be a corresponding fcoemon/fipvlan change along with
this, and existing utilities will not work. Also the way
From: Naresh Kumar Inna nar...@chelsio.com
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:09:07 +0530
This patch contains minor fixes to make cxgb4vf driver work with the updates
to
shared firmware/hardware header files.
Signed-off-by: Naresh Kumar Inna nar...@chelsio.com
You cannot submit a patch set that
From: Naresh Kumar Inna nar...@chelsio.com
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:09:03 +0530
+#include linux/moduleparam.h
This header include is not necessary.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-scsi in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info
On Tue 11 Sep 2012 10:06:29 AM PDT, Chris Leech wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Robert Love robert.w.l...@intel.com wrote:
snip
1) Create/alloc the port
- Allocate kernel memory and create per-instance sysfs devices
- No discovery or login
# echo eth3.172-fcoe
On Tue 11 Sep 2012 10:12:09 AM PDT, Chris Leech wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Bhanu Prakash Gollapudi
bprak...@broadcom.com wrote:
I'm concerned that we will be breaking user space compatibility with this
change, as there should be a corresponding fcoemon/fipvlan change along with
On Tue 11 Sep 2012 10:36:35 AM PDT, Love, Robert W wrote:
On Tue 11 Sep 2012 10:06:29 AM PDT, Chris Leech wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Robert Love robert.w.l...@intel.com wrote:
snip
That being said, I'm glad this is being reworked. Do you have any
other functionality in mind
Il 11/09/2012 18:59, Tejun Heo ha scritto:
FWIW, I don't think this is the right way to expose functionality
which needs management in terms of access control, interpretation
(stacking drivers) and serving concurrent users. SG_IO filtering was
mostly for cd/dvd burning and other removeable
Hello, Paolo.
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 07:56:53PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Understood; unfortunately, there is another major user of it
(virtualization). If you are passing raw LUNs down to a virtual
machine, there's no possibility at all to use a properly encapsulated
Is there still
On 9/11/2012 10:36 AM, Love, Robert W wrote:
On Tue 11 Sep 2012 10:06:29 AM PDT, Chris Leech wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Robert Love robert.w.l...@intel.com wrote:
snip
1) Create/alloc the port
- Allocate kernel memory and create per-instance sysfs devices
- No
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 5:41 AM, James Bottomley
jbottom...@parallels.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 12:29 +, Dorau, Lukasz wrote:
Hi James
What are you going to do with the following four ISCI patches from
isci-for-3.6 tag?:
6734092e66011def7875bd67beef889d0fee1cc9isci: add a
On Tue 11 Sep 2012 11:31:08 AM PDT, Bhanu Prakash Gollapudi wrote:
On 9/11/2012 10:36 AM, Love, Robert W wrote:
On Tue 11 Sep 2012 10:06:29 AM PDT, Chris Leech wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Robert Love
robert.w.l...@intel.com wrote:
snip
1) Create/alloc the port
- Allocate
Il 11/09/2012 20:29, Tejun Heo ha scritto: Hello, Paolo.
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 07:56:53PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Understood; unfortunately, there is another major user of it
(virtualization). If you are passing raw LUNs down to a virtual
machine, there's no possibility at all to use
Hello, Paolo.
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 08:54:03PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 07:56:53PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Understood; unfortunately, there is another major user of it
(virtualization). If you are passing raw LUNs down to a virtual
machine, there's no
Il 11/09/2012 21:13, Tejun Heo ha scritto:
Hello, Paolo.
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 08:54:03PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 07:56:53PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Understood; unfortunately, there is another major user of it
(virtualization). If you are passing raw LUNs
Hello, Paolo.
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 09:24:32PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Couldn't it intercept some of them - e.g. RWs and discards?
What's the benifit / use case of doing pure bypass?
Basically, using the same storage technology for bare metal and
virtualized systems. IMHO losing
[Al: you can jump down to One problem:]
Il 11/09/2012 22:01, Tejun Heo ha scritto:
Hello, Paolo.
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 09:24:32PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Couldn't it intercept some of them - e.g. RWs and discards?
What's the benifit / use case of doing pure bypass?
Basically, using
Hello, Paolo.
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:50:38PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Either way, with or without virtualization, making detailed error
information to userland is a valid goal. I *think* we're finally
getting there after years of talking via structured printk. I don't
know much
Il 12/09/2012 00:02, Tejun Heo ha scritto:
SG_IO itself is a bypassing interface. It bypasses most of block
layer and the kernel doesn't have any idea (apart from the adhoc
filtering) about what's going on.
That's very much the point. The guest must have free reins.
You asked Could being
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 12/09/2012 00:02, Tejun Heo ha scritto:
SG_IO itself is a bypassing interface. It bypasses most of block
layer and the kernel doesn't have any idea (apart from the adhoc
filtering) about what's going on.
James Bottomley james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com writes:
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 15:07 -0400, David Miller wrote:
From: ebied...@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 15:39:21 -0700
The scsi netlink code confuses the netlink port id with a process id,
going so far
From: ebied...@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:40:08 -0700
So just for curiosity I searched the entire git history for scsi_nl_add_
and the only commit that I found was the addition of that code to the
tree in August of 2008.
Does anyone have any reason to keep
Today, when i removed some disks from softraid and found this oops.
But i did not find how to reproduce.
The message is:
[ 2796.107120] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
0837
[ 2796.107123] IP: [813d2839] scsi_eh_flush_done_q+0x49/0xe0
[ 2796.107129]
On 9/11/2012 11:03 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Naresh Kumar Inna nar...@chelsio.com
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:09:07 +0530
This patch contains minor fixes to make cxgb4vf driver work with the updates
to
shared firmware/hardware header files.
Signed-off-by: Naresh Kumar Inna
On 9/11/2012 11:05 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Naresh Kumar Inna nar...@chelsio.com
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:09:03 +0530
+#include linux/moduleparam.h
This header include is not necessary.
I will remove it, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
From: Naresh Kumar Inna nar...@chelsio.com
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 11:05:22 +0530
On 9/11/2012 11:03 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Naresh Kumar Inna nar...@chelsio.com
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:09:07 +0530
This patch contains minor fixes to make cxgb4vf driver work with the
updates to
44 matches
Mail list logo
