On 9/11/2014 3:07 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
Sagi == Sagi Grimberg sa...@dev.mellanox.co.il writes:
[Back from vacation]
Hey Martin,
+ [SCSI_PROT_WRITE_PASS] = SCSI_PROT_TRANSFER_PI |
+ SCSI_PROT_GUARD_CHECK |
+ SCSI_PROT_REF_CHECK |
+ SCSI_PROT_REF_INCREMENT |
+
Hi,
On 09/10/2014 10:54 PM, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
On 14-09-10 08:13 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi All,
I'm mailing all of you because you've reported various problems
with the new uas support in kernel 3.16 and later.
I've been working on making the uas driver more resilient to
errors, as
-Original Message-
From: Vivek Goyal [mailto:vgo...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 9:17 PM
To: Tomas Henzl
Cc: Elliott, Robert (Server Storage); Sumit Saxena;
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org;
martin.peter...@oracle.com; h...@infradead.org;
jbottom...@parallels.com;
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org # 3.16
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
---
drivers/usb/storage/uas-detect.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/uas-detect.h b/drivers/usb/storage/uas-detect.h
index 1e298ec..8a6f371 100644
---
Hi,
On 09/10/2014 05:45 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 09:21:24AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
I've applied the patch, this results in the following new dmesg output
when using uas:
[ 120.602632] initialized host-wide tag map!
Thank you for looking into this.
So
Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com writes:
--- a/drivers/usb/storage/uas-detect.h
+++ b/drivers/usb/storage/uas-detect.h
@@ -73,8 +73,8 @@ static int uas_use_uas_driver(struct usb_interface *intf,
* broken on the ASM1051, use the number of streams to differentiate.
* New
On 09/11/2014 11:02 AM, Kashyap Desai wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Vivek Goyal [mailto:vgo...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 9:17 PM
To: Tomas Henzl
Cc: Elliott, Robert (Server Storage); Sumit Saxena;
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org;
martin.peter...@oracle.com;
On 09/11/2014 04:48 AM, Kashyap Desai wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Tomas Henzl the...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/06/2014 03:25 PM, sumit.sax...@avagotech.com wrote:
Problem statement:
MFI link list in megaraid_sas driver is used from mfi-mpt pass-through
commands.
This list can be
2014-09-10 20:54 GMT+09:00 Dolev Raviv dra...@codeaurora.org:
+static void ufshcd_set_queue_depth(struct scsi_device *sdev)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+ u8 lun_qdepth;
+ struct ufs_hba *hba;
+
+ hba = shost_priv(sdev-host);
+
+ lun_qdepth = hba-nutrs;
+ ret =
2014-09-10 20:54 GMT+09:00 Dolev Raviv dra...@codeaurora.org:
+static int ufshcd_config_pwr_mode(struct ufs_hba *hba,
+ struct ufs_pa_layer_attr *desired_pwr_mode)
+{
+ struct ufs_pa_layer_attr final_params = { 0 };
+ int ret;
+
+ if
scsifront_action_handler() will deadlock on host-host_lock, if the
ring is full and it has to wait for entries to become available.
Signed-off-by: David Vrabel david.vra...@citrix.com
---
This was found with sparse. I've not tested it.
---
drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c |3 ++-
1 file changed,
On 09/11/2014 03:31 PM, David Vrabel wrote:
scsifront_action_handler() will deadlock on host-host_lock, if the
ring is full and it has to wait for entries to become available.
Signed-off-by: David Vrabel david.vra...@citrix.com
---
This was found with sparse. I've not tested it.
Test might be
On 09/11/2014 05:59 AM, Ching Huang wrote:
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 11:58 +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
On 09/09/2014 06:30 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Ching,
do you have a chance to address Thomas second concern below? As
far as I can tell (Thomas, please correct me) that's the last
outstanding
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:01:13PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
So we're initializing the tag map, but scsi_activate_tcq doesn't pick it
up. I can't really come up with a good explanation for it, but there
even without that there is an elephant in the room: as part of the
scsi-mq series I
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Tomas Henzl the...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/11/2014 11:02 AM, Kashyap Desai wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Vivek Goyal [mailto:vgo...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 9:17 PM
To: Tomas Henzl
Cc: Elliott, Robert (Server Storage); Sumit
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:09:27PM +0530, Kashyap Desai wrote:
[..]
OK, just keep in mind that the is_kdump_kernel() is not yet in mainline.
Sure I read that part, but when I check kernel source I found
is_kdump_kernel() is available.
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Tomas Henzl the...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/11/2014 04:48 AM, Kashyap Desai wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Tomas Henzl the...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/06/2014 03:25 PM, sumit.sax...@avagotech.com wrote:
Problem statement:
MFI link list in megaraid_sas
On 09/11/2014 06:39 PM, Kashyap Desai wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Tomas Henzl the...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/11/2014 11:02 AM, Kashyap Desai wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Vivek Goyal [mailto:vgo...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 9:17 PM
To: Tomas Henzl
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Tomas Henzl the...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/11/2014 06:39 PM, Kashyap Desai wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Tomas Henzl the...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/11/2014 11:02 AM, Kashyap Desai wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Vivek Goyal
On 09/11/2014 08:41 PM, Kashyap Desai wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Tomas Henzl the...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/11/2014 04:48 AM, Kashyap Desai wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Tomas Henzl the...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/06/2014 03:25 PM, sumit.sax...@avagotech.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Tomas Henzl [mailto:the...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 12:50 AM
To: Kashyap Desai
Cc: Sumit Saxena; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; Martin K. Petersen;
Christoph
Hellwig; jbottom...@parallels.com; aradford
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11]
On Tue, 2014-09-09 at 16:01 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Tuesday, September 09, 2014 03:46:23 PM James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 07:41 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
The thing is that we have to have dynamic mechanism to listen for
device attachments no matter what and such
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:59:25PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
On Tue, 2014-09-09 at 16:01 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Tuesday, September 09, 2014 03:46:23 PM James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 07:41 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
The thing is that we have to have
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
dmitry.torok...@gmail.com wrote:
There are elements in common, but by and
large the biggest headaches at least in large device number boots have
already been tackled by the enterprise crowd (they don't like their
S390's or 1024 core NUMA
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 01:42:20PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
dmitry.torok...@gmail.com wrote:
There are elements in common, but by and
large the biggest headaches at least in large device number boots have
already been tackled by
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
dmitry.torok...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 01:42:20PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
dmitry.torok...@gmail.com wrote:
There are elements in common, but by and
large the
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:06:12AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org # 3.16
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
---
drivers/usb/storage/uas-detect.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
You forgot the reported-by line, I'll go add it...
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
mcg...@do-not-panic.com wrote:
More than two years
have gone by on growing design and assumptions on top of that original
commit. I'm not sure if *systemd folks* yet believe its was a design
regression?
I don't think so. udev should not
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
mcg...@do-not-panic.com wrote:
More than two years
have gone by on growing design and assumptions on top of that original
commit. I'm not sure if *systemd folks* yet believe
This is the defintion of the field in SPC (does the UFS spec duplicate all
of SPC?),
Yes, UFS device specification (both 1.1 and 2.0) supports
[SAM], INCITS T10 draft standard: SCSI Architecture Model - 5 (SAM-5),
Revision 05, 19 May 2010
[SPC], INCITS T10 draft standard: SCSI Primary Commands
Sagi == Sagi Grimberg sa...@dev.mellanox.co.il writes:
Sagi,
Sagi That's still a dependence on prot_type (type 0...). Notice that
Sagi you set SCSI_PROT_REF_INCREMENT in every op index (except
Sagi SCSI_PROT_NORMAL) so my point is that it's strange to see this
Sagi association.
I still don't
On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 16:21 +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
On 09/11/2014 05:59 AM, Ching Huang wrote:
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 11:58 +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
On 09/09/2014 06:30 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Ching,
do you have a chance to address Thomas second concern below? As
far as I can
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez
mcg...@do-not-panic.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
How about simply introducing a new flag to finit_module() to indicate
that the caller does not care about asynchronicity. We could then pass
33 matches
Mail list logo
