On 2/6/2015 7:16 AM, Tomas Henzl wrote:
On 02/05/2015 08:23 PM, James Smart wrote:
---
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hw4.h | 1 +
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c | 179 +-
2 files changed, 125 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
diff --git
Markus,
Suggestions noted. If not merged, I'll pull them into the next patch set.
-- james
Acked-By: James Smart james.sm...@emulex.com
On 2/5/2015 5:25 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
From: Markus Elfring elfr...@users.sourceforge.net
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 23:17:52 +0100
Another update
agree - nice nit.
I'll add this to the list of things to merge in the next patch update.
-- james
On 2/6/2015 7:20 AM, Tomas Henzl wrote:
On 02/05/2015 08:24 PM, James Smart wrote:
---
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_ct.c | 23 ---
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 3
I can't quite tell if this is a patch request being sent to netdev/David
Miller or if it's a suggestion sent to Chelsio that you'd like Chelsio to
adopt. I ~think~ it's the latter because the subject doesn't include the
standard formatting for a patch request but I'm not 100% familiar with
Okay, thanks for your patience with my lack of understanding. I'll work with
Hariprasad tomorrow to get a revised patch out with the const change and
eliminate the redundant check of CH_PCI_DEVICE_ID_TABLE_DEFINE_BEGIN to guard
the file contents. Thanks for caching these improvements!
Looks good.
Acked-By: James Smart james.sm...@emulex.com
-- james
On 1/26/2015 10:18 AM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
Without a shutdown handler, some cards behave very badly after a kexec.
During probe, pending DMA writes will corrupt kernel memory, for
example.
Using the remove
I understand that OS-independence issues aren't something which are normally
accommodated, but as long as definitions don't introduce unnecessary foreign
intrusion I would hope that it would be okay. As I noted, our t4_regs.h file
is also OS-independent and used by six other OS device
On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 19:07 +, Casey Leedom wrote:
I understand that OS-independence issues aren't something which are
normally accommodated, but as long as definitions don't introduce
unnecessary foreign intrusion I would hope that it would be okay.
As I noted, our t4_regs.h file is
Hi Nicholas,
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 6:52 PM, Gavin Guo gavin@canonical.com wrote:
Hi Nicholas,
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
n...@linux-iscsi.org wrote:
Hi Gavin,
On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 08:28 +0800, Gavin Guo wrote:
Hi Nicholas,
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 11:47
On 2/14/2015 5:27 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
From: Nicholas Bellinger n...@linux-iscsi.org
This patch adds a sbc_check_dpofua() function that performs sanity
checks for DPO/FUA command bits.
It introduces checks to fail when either bit is set, but the backend
device is not advertising
10 matches
Mail list logo
