https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201199
--- Comment #6 from Seb Lu (se...@seblu.net) ---
Created attachment 278709
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=278709=edit
controller version
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201199
--- Comment #7 from Seb Lu (se...@seblu.net) ---
Created attachment 278711
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=278711=edit
lspci
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201199
--- Comment #5 from Seb Lu (se...@seblu.net) ---
Created attachment 278707
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=278707=edit
bios version
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201199
--- Comment #4 from Seb Lu (se...@seblu.net) ---
Created attachment 278705
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=278705=edit
config for 4.15.0-22 (working ubuntu)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201199
--- Comment #3 from Seb Lu (se...@seblu.net) ---
Created attachment 278703
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=278703=edit
config for 4.19-rc4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201199
--- Comment #2 from Seb Lu (se...@seblu.net) ---
Created attachment 278701
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=278701=edit
boot udevd traceback
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201199
--- Comment #1 from Seb Lu (se...@seblu.net) ---
Created attachment 278699
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=278699=edit
boot failure message
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201199
Bug ID: 201199
Summary: hpsa blocking boot on HP smart Array P410
Product: IO/Storage
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 4.18.3
Hardware: Intel
OS: Linux
Tree:
On 09/20/2018 07:32 PM, wenxi...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(res, _cfg->used_res_q, queue) {
> + if (res->add_to_ml) {
> + bus = res->bus;
> + target = res->target;
> + lun = res->lun;
> +
On 9/21/18 5:15 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
The WARN_ON() is pointless as the rport is placed in SDEV_TRANSPORT_OFFLINE
at that time, so no new commands can be submitted via srp_queuecomment()
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke
---
drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c | 7 ---
1 file changed,
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 02:15:05PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> The WARN_ON() is pointless as the rport is placed in SDEV_TRANSPORT_OFFLINE
> at that time, so no new commands can be submitted via srp_queuecomment()
s/srp_queuecomment/srp_queuecommand/
--
Johannes Thumshirn
The WARN_ON() is pointless as the rport is placed in SDEV_TRANSPORT_OFFLINE
at that time, so no new commands can be submitted via srp_queuecomment()
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke
---
drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c | 7 ---
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git
Make ufshcd_send_uic_cmd() public for that.
Signed-off-by: Avri Altman
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs_bsg.c | 11 ++-
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c| 4 ++--
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h| 2 ++
include/uapi/scsi/scsi_bsg_ufs.h | 2 ++
4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3
Use the structure size in pointer arithmetic's instead of
an opaque 32 bytes for the over allocation of descriptors.
Signed-off-by: Avri Altman
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h| 2 +-
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 3 +--
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
The UFS host software uses a combination of a host register set,
and Transfer Request Descriptors in system memory to communicate
with host controller hardware. In its mmio space, a separate places
are assigned to UTP Transfer Request Descriptor ("utrd") list, and
to UTP Task Management Request
Add a bsg endpoint that supports UPIUs.
For now, just provide an API to allocate and remove
ufs-bsg node. We will use this framework to
manage ufs devices by sending UPIU transactions.
For the time being, implements an empty bsg_request() -
will add some more functionality in coming patches.
From: Christoph Hellwig
Add a helper that takes a utp_task_req_desc and issues it, which will
be useful for UFS bsg support. Rewrite ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd0x to use
this new helper.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 141
Do that for the currently supported UPIUs:
query, nop out, and task management.
We do not support UPIU of type scsi command yet, while
we are using the job's request and reply pointers to hold
the payload. We will look into it in later patches.
We might need to elaborate the raw upiu api for
Here is a proposal to use a bsg endpoint to manage ufs devices.
We will do that by adding a bsg device node to the ufs driver,
and use it to send UPIU transactions to the ufs device.
It will serve as a ufs device management infrastructure,
for device configuration, provisioning, testing and
From: Christoph Hellwig
Remove the pointless task_req_upiu and task_rsp_upiu indirections,
which are __le32 arrays always cast to given structures and just add
the members directly. Also clean up variables names in use in the
callers a bit to make the code more readable.
Signed-off-by:
Thanks for your reponse and feedback,
>> If the disk has no write cache the following errors are being logged.
>> * sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] No Caching mode page found
>> * sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through
>>
>> Lower the severity from error to info.
>> The absence of a write cache
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 4:37 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > +u8
> > +mpt3sas_base_pci_device_is_available(struct MPT3SAS_ADAPTER *ioc)
> > +{
> > + if (ioc->pci_error_recovery ||
> > + (!pci_device_is_present(ioc->pdev)))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + return 1;
>
22 matches
Mail list logo
