Re: [4.10, panic, regression] iscsi: null pointer deref at iscsi_tcp_segment_done+0x20d/0x2e0

On Wed, 21 Dec 2016, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > > There may be deeper issues. I just started running scalability tests > > (e.g. 16-way fsmark create tests) and about a minute in I got a > > directory corruption reported

Re: [PATCH rc8-mm1] hotfix libata-scsi corruption

On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, James Bottomley wrote: --- 2.6.24-rc8-mm1/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c2008-01-17 16:49:47.0 + +++ linux/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c 2008-01-22 15:45:40.0 + @@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ static void ata_scsi_sdev_config(struct

Re: [PATCH rc8-mm1] hotfix libata-scsi corruption

On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, James Bottomley wrote: Actually, I don't think it's a smaller I/O issue. The SMART protocol specifically mandates that the transfers for SMART READ DATA and SMART READ LOG shall be 512 bytes). However, the pio transfer routine does seem to be assuming sector alignment

Re: [PATCH rc8-mm1] hotfix libata-scsi corruption

On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Alan Cox wrote: However, I'd like to see if we can track the problem through the SG_IO direct path ... how many adjacent page bytes are corrupt? Just a few or a large number (I'm wondering if it's an off by one or off by alignment type bug)? We moved away from that

Re: [PATCH rc8-mm1] hotfix libata-scsi corruption

On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, James Bottomley wrote: libsas looks to be OK because it specifically kmallocs a 512 byte buffer which should (for off slab data) be 512 byte aligned. I don't remember the various SLAB and SLOB and SLUB rules offhand: I'm not sure it's safe to rely on such alignment on all

Re: [patch 14/28] scsi: fix CONFIG_SCSI_WAIT_SCAN=m

Regression still outstanding: ping? On Fri, 18 May 2007, Hugh Dickins wrote: On Fri, 11 May 2007, Hugh Dickins wrote: On Thu, 10 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Hugh Dickins [EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIG_MODULES=y CONFIG_SCSI=y CONFIG_SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC=y

Re: [patch 14/28] scsi: fix CONFIG_SCSI_WAIT_SCAN=m

On Fri, 11 May 2007, Hugh Dickins wrote: On Thu, 10 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Hugh Dickins [EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIG_MODULES=y CONFIG_SCSI=y CONFIG_SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC=y CONFIG_SCSI_WAIT_SCAN=m 2.6.21-rc5-mm2 VFS panics unable to find my root on /dev/sda2, but boots

Re: [patch 14/28] scsi: fix CONFIG_SCSI_WAIT_SCAN=m

On Thu, 10 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Hugh Dickins [EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIG_MODULES=y CONFIG_SCSI=y CONFIG_SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC=y CONFIG_SCSI_WAIT_SCAN=m 2.6.21-rc5-mm2 VFS panics unable to find my root on /dev/sda2, but boots okay if I change drivers/scsi/Kconfig to default y