RE: [PATCH 0/6] v4 block refcount conversion patches

> Elena Reshetova writes: > > Elena Reshetova (6): > > block: convert bio.__bi_cnt from atomic_t to refcount_t > > block: convert blk_queue_tag.refcnt from atomic_t to refcount_t > > block: convert blkcg_gq.refcnt from atomic_t to refcount_t > > block: convert

RE: [PATCH 0/5] v3 block subsystem refcounter conversions

> On 06/28/2017 05:58 AM, Reshetova, Elena wrote: > > > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] v3 block subsystem refcounter conversions > >> > >> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 6:26 AM, Jens Axboe <ax...@kernel.dk> wrote: > >>> On 06/27/2017 05:39 AM, Elena Re

RE: [PATCH 0/5] v3 block subsystem refcounter conversions

> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] v3 block subsystem refcounter conversions > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 6:26 AM, Jens Axboe wrote: > > On 06/27/2017 05:39 AM, Elena Reshetova wrote: > >> Changes in v3: > >> No changes in patches apart from trivial rebases, but now by > >> default

RE: [PATCH 0/5] v2: block subsystem refcounter conversions

> Hi Elena, > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 04:10:16PM +, Reshetova, Elena wrote: > > > > > All the objections from DaveM on the amount of cycles spent on the > > > new refcount_t apply to the block layer fast path operations as well. > > > >

RE: [PATCH 0/5] v2: block subsystem refcounter conversions

> All the objections from DaveM on the amount of cycles spent on the > new refcount_t apply to the block layer fast path operations as well. Ok, could you please indicate the correct way to measure the impact for the block layer? We can do the measurements. Best Regards, Elena. > > Please

RE: [PATCH 08/29] drivers, md: convert mddev.active from atomic_t to refcount_t

> On Tue, 2017-03-14 at 12:29 +0000, Reshetova, Elena wrote: > > > Elena Reshetova <elena.reshet...@intel.com> writes: > > > > > > > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be > > > > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used a

RE: [PATCH 08/29] drivers, md: convert mddev.active from atomic_t to refcount_t

> Elena Reshetova writes: > > > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be > > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as > > a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental > > refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free > > situations.

RE: [PATCH 22/29] drivers, scsi: convert iscsi_task.refcount from atomic_t to refcount_t

> On 03/09/2017 08:18 AM, Reshetova, Elena wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:21:09PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote: > >>> refcount_t type and corresponding API should be > >>> used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as > >>> a re

RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 29/29] drivers, xen: convert grant_map.users from atomic_t to refcount_t

> On 03/08/2017 08:49 AM, Reshetova, Elena wrote: > >> On 03/06/2017 09:21 AM, Elena Reshetova wrote: > >>> refcount_t type and corresponding API should be > >>> used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as > >>> a reference counter.

RE: [PATCH 22/29] drivers, scsi: convert iscsi_task.refcount from atomic_t to refcount_t

> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:21:09PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote: > > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be > > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as > > a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental > > refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free > >

RE: [PATCH 21/29] drivers, s390: convert fc_fcp_pkt.ref_cnt from atomic_t to refcount_t

> On 03/06/2017 03:21 PM, Elena Reshetova wrote: > > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be > > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as > > a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental > > refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free > > situations. > >

RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 29/29] drivers, xen: convert grant_map.users from atomic_t to refcount_t

> On 03/06/2017 09:21 AM, Elena Reshetova wrote: > > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be > > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as > > a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental > > refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free > > situations. > > >

RE: [PATCH 08/29] drivers, md: convert mddev.active from atomic_t to refcount_t

> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:20:55PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote: > > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be > > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as > > a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental > > refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free > >

RE: [PATCH 10/29] drivers, md: convert stripe_head.count from atomic_t to refcount_t

> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:20:57PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote: > > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be > > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as > > a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental > > refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free > >

RE: [PATCH 13/29] drivers, media: convert vb2_vmarea_handler.refcount from atomic_t to refcount_t

> Hi Elena, > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:21:00PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote: > > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be > > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as > > a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental > > refcounter overflows that might lead to

RE: [PATCH 12/29] drivers, media: convert s2255_dev.num_channels from atomic_t to refcount_t

> Hi Elena, > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:20:59PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote: > > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be > > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as > > a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental > > refcounter overflows that might lead to

RE: [PATCH 21/29] drivers, s390: convert fc_fcp_pkt.ref_cnt from atomic_t to refcount_t

> On 03/06/2017 03:21 PM, Elena Reshetova wrote: > > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be > > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as > > a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental > > refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free > > situations. > >

RE: [PATCH 11/29] drivers, media: convert cx88_core.refcount from atomic_t to refcount_t

> Hello. > > On 03/06/2017 05:20 PM, Elena Reshetova wrote: > > > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be > > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as > > a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental > > refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free > >