RE: [PATCH] pm8001: mark symbols static where possible

Thanks for fix. Acked-by: Lindar Liu > -Original Message- > From: Baoyou Xie [mailto:baoyou@linaro.org] > Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 9:54 PM > To: jinpu.w...@profitbricks.com; lindar_...@usish.com; > j...@linux.vnet.ibm.com; martin.peter...@oracle.com >

RE: [PATCH] [scsi] : pm80xx : fix problem of pm8001_work_fn reseting uncorrect phy device

On Friday, February 14, 2014 4:01 PM, XinHong Zhu wrote: If a phy device is removed ,the device can get error of I/O and HBA maybe receieve IO_OPEN_CNX_ERROR_IT_NEXUS_LOSS of event which causes pm8001_work_fn to reset the phy device ,but in pm8001_task_exec don't assign a value for field

RE: [PATCH] [SCSI] pm80xx : no need for tag allocation when issuing the command of unregistering device

On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 12:00 PM, XinHong Zhu wrote: In function pm8001_dev_gone_notify require a tag from bitmap resource and later don't free tag resource .So tag resource will be consume fully and following request can not be execed because of lack of tags . But in the function don't need

RE: [PATCH 11/16] pm8001: clean up unnecessary MSI/MSI-X capability find

On 08/08/2013 9:10 PM, Yijing Wang wrote: PCI core will initialize device MSI/MSI-X capability in pci_msi_init_pci_dev(). So device driver should use pci_dev- msi_cap/msix_cap to determine whether the device support MSI/MSI-X instead of using pci_find_capability(pci_dev, PCI_CAP_ID_MSI/MSIX).

RE: [PATCH] sas: unify the pointlessly separated enums sas_dev_type and sas_device_type

Thanks for fix. Lindar. -Original Message- From: James Bottomley [mailto:james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 5:44 AM To: linux-scsi Cc: Lukasz Dorau; Maciej Patelczyk; Dave Jiang; xjtu...@gmail.com; lindar_...@usish.com; Xiangliang Yu Subject: [PATCH]