This patch fixes the following section mismatches:
-- snip --
...
WARNING: drivers/scsi/qlogicpti.o(.devexit.text+0x8): Section mismatch in
reference from the function qpti_sbus_remove() to the function
.init.text:qpti_chain_del()
WARNING: drivers/scsi/qlogicpti.o(.devinit.text+0x56c):
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 22:03 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
This patch fixes the following section mismatches:
-- snip --
...
WARNING: drivers/scsi/qlogicpti.o(.devexit.text+0x8): Section mismatch in
reference from the function qpti_sbus_remove() to the function
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 03:00:16PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 22:03 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
This patch fixes the following section mismatches:
-- snip --
...
WARNING: drivers/scsi/qlogicpti.o(.devexit.text+0x8): Section mismatch in
reference from
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 10:20:11PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 03:00:16PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
...
To my understanding Adrian just fixed a potential oops.
You have a driver that surely are thought to be hotplugable -
otherwise qpti_sbus_probe() would not have
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 22:20 +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 03:00:16PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 22:03 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
This patch fixes the following section mismatches:
-- snip --
...
WARNING:
I'm just reflecting that all of the
problems would go away and we'd save thousands of person hours on the
infrastructure and bug fixing if we simply #defined most of the
sectional annotations to be nops.
So far I have only seen three persons being really active in fixing the
section mismatch
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 03:00:16PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 22:03 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
This patch fixes the following section mismatches:
-- snip --
...
WARNING: drivers/scsi/qlogicpti.o(.devexit.text+0x8): Section mismatch in
reference from
7 matches
Mail list logo
