On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 07:22:59PM -0400, Luben Tuikov wrote:
On 08/22/05 01:12, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
I was surprised how much code needed changing.
With MODE SELECT's issues with libata addressed
various other SAT extras should be much easier
to implement. That should make libata more
On 08/24/05 07:03, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
Luben Tuikov wrote:
On 08/22/05 01:12, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
I was surprised how much code needed changing.
With MODE SELECT's issues with libata addressed
various other SAT extras should be much easier
to implement. That should make libata more
On 08/22/05 01:12, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
I was surprised how much code needed changing.
With MODE SELECT's issues with libata addressed
various other SAT extras should be much easier
to implement. That should make libata more attractive
as a SAT layer for SAS LLDDs (that don't do it already
Douglas Gilbert wrote:
With repect to my libata TEST UNIT READY patch there
is a good chance that can be dropped. The feedback
from the t10 reflector seems to indicate the current
definition may be changed, unfortunately the proposed
changes may require some SAT state information being
held for
NOTIFYJeff Garzik wrote:
Douglas Gilbert wrote:
The attachment is for discussion. It adds MODE SELECT
support to libata allowing the write(back) cache and
read ahead to be manipulated by users [i.e. the WCE and
DRA ** bits in the SCSI Caching mode page].
In general I approve of this
The attachment is for discussion. It adds MODE SELECT
support to libata allowing the write(back) cache and
read ahead to be manipulated by users [i.e. the WCE and
DRA ** bits in the SCSI Caching mode page].
The patch is against lk 2.6.13-rc6 and includes the
SSU patch (but not the TUR patch).
6 matches
Mail list logo