On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 18:54 +0100, Bernd Schubert wrote:
[Hmm, resending since mail after more than 30min still not on the ML, maybe
the attachment was too large? I have uploaded the log to
http://www.pci.uni-heidelberg.de/tc/usr/bernd/downloads/scsi/kern.log.1]
On Wednesday 12 December
Hi,
below is a patch introducing device recovery, trying to prevent i/o errors
when a DID_NO_CONNECT or SOFT_ERROR does happen.
The patch still needs quite some work:
1.) I still didn't figure out what is the best place to run
sdev-deh.ehandler = kthread_run(scsi_device_error_handler, ...)
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 01:54:14PM +0100, Bernd Schubert wrote:
below is a patch introducing device recovery, trying to prevent i/o errors
when a DID_NO_CONNECT or SOFT_ERROR does happen.
Why doesn't the regular scsi_eh do what you need?
--
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 14:39:27 Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 01:54:14PM +0100, Bernd Schubert wrote:
below is a patch introducing device recovery, trying to prevent i/o
errors when a DID_NO_CONNECT or SOFT_ERROR does happen.
Why doesn't the regular scsi_eh do what
[Hmm, resending since mail after more than 30min still not on the ML, maybe
the attachment was too large? I have uploaded the log to
http://www.pci.uni-heidelberg.de/tc/usr/bernd/downloads/scsi/kern.log.1]
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 16:59:36 James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at
5 matches
Mail list logo
