On Sat, 2015-07-25 at 08:48 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 01:32:14PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
We've already been through this discussion a couple of years back when
target_submit_cmd() first came into existence.
The reason iscsi/iser-target continues
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 01:32:14PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
We've already been through this discussion a couple of years back when
target_submit_cmd() first came into existence.
The reason iscsi/iser-target continues to be a special case is due to
immediate data vs. non immediate
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 03:19:32PM -0700, Spencer Baugh wrote:
From: Alexei Potashnik ale...@purestorage.com
If command didn't match a LUN and we're sending check condition, the
target_cmd_complete ftrace point will crash because it assumes that
cmd-t_task_cdb has been set.
The fix will
On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 12:52 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 03:19:32PM -0700, Spencer Baugh wrote:
From: Alexei Potashnik ale...@purestorage.com
If command didn't match a LUN and we're sending check condition, the
target_cmd_complete ftrace point will crash
From: Alexei Potashnik ale...@purestorage.com
If command didn't match a LUN and we're sending check condition, the
target_cmd_complete ftrace point will crash because it assumes that
cmd-t_task_cdb has been set.
The fix will temporarily set t_task_cdb to the se_cmd buffer
and copy first 6 bytes
From: Alexei Potashnik ale...@purestorage.com
If command didn't match a LUN and we're sending check condition, the
target_cmd_complete ftrace point will crash because it assumes that
cmd-t_task_cdb has been set.
The fix will temporarily set t_task_cdb to the se_cmd buffer
and copy first 6 bytes
6 matches
Mail list logo