On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Gwendal Grignou gwen...@google.com wrote:
What's the benefit of this?
+ To unify ata transport sysfs topology with other scsi transport.
My concern is the thrash and breakage to switch the ordering around
given the (minor) growing pains injecting an ata_port into
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Dan Williams d...@fb.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Gwendal Grignou gwen...@google.com wrote:
This set of patches improve ATA transport classes integration with SCSI
objects.
Before [2.6.x]
Ata and scsi transport class where separated:
This set of patches improve ATA transport classes integration with SCSI
objects.
Before [2.6.x]
Ata and scsi transport class where separated:
`--:09:00.0
| `--ata1
| | `--port_port
| | `--link1
| | | `--dev1.0
| | | `--dev1.1
| `--ata2
| ...
| `--host0
| | `--scsi_host
| |
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Gwendal Grignou gwen...@google.com wrote:
This set of patches improve ATA transport classes integration with SCSI
objects.
Before [2.6.x]
Ata and scsi transport class where separated:
`--:09:00.0
| `--ata1
| | `--port_port
| | `--link1
| | |
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:04:01PM -0700, Gwendal Grignou wrote:
This set of patches improve ATA transport classes integration with SCSI
objects.
Before [2.6.x]
Ata and scsi transport class where separated:
`--:09:00.0
| `--ata1
| | `--port_port
| | `--link1
| | |
This set of patches improve ATA transport classes integration with SCSI
objects.
Before [2.6.x]
Ata and scsi transport class where separated:
`--:09:00.0
| `--ata1
| | `--port_port
| | `--link1
| | | `--dev1.0
| | | `--dev1.1
| `--ata2
| ...
| `--host0
| | `--scsi_host
| |
6 matches
Mail list logo