subject:"\[PATCH 02\/11\] IB\/isert\: seperate connection protection domains and dma MRs"

Re: [PATCH 02/11] IB/isert: seperate connection protection domains and dma MRs

2014-01-13 Thread Nicholas A. Bellinger

Hi Sagi, On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 18:40 +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote: It is more correct to seperate connections protection domains and dma_mr handles. protection information support requires to do so. Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg sa...@mellanox.com --- drivers/infiniband/ulp/isert/ib_isert.c

[PATCH 02/11] IB/isert: seperate connection protection domains and dma MRs

2014-01-09 Thread Sagi Grimberg

It is more correct to seperate connections protection domains and dma_mr handles. protection information support requires to do so. Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg sa...@mellanox.com --- drivers/infiniband/ulp/isert/ib_isert.c | 46 ---