Hi James,
I've gotten mail that you have accepted patches 2/3 and 3/3 from this series.
This one has been accepted by Steve also, so please consider taking also this
1/3.
Thanks, Tomas
On 08/01/2013 03:11 PM, Tomas Henzl wrote:
From: Tomas Henzl the...@redhat.com
The cmd_pool_bits is
On 08/06/2013 05:46 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 01:13:59PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
On 08/01/2013 06:18 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 05:39:36PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
On 08/01/2013 05:19 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 01:13:59PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
On 08/01/2013 06:18 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 05:39:36PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
On 08/01/2013 05:19 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
[...]
Btw. on line 1284 - isn't it similar to
On 08/01/2013 06:18 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 05:39:36PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
On 08/01/2013 05:19 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
[...]
Btw. on line 1284 - isn't it similar to patch 2/3 ?
^^^ Oh, missed this the first time around, the sop
From: Tomas Henzl the...@redhat.com
The cmd_pool_bits is protected everywhere with a spinlock,
we don't need the test_and_set_bit, set_bit is enough and the loop
can be removed too.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Henzl the...@redhat.com
---
drivers/scsi/hpsa.c | 15 ++-
1 file changed, 6
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 03:11:22PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
From: Tomas Henzl the...@redhat.com
The cmd_pool_bits is protected everywhere with a spinlock,
we don't need the test_and_set_bit, set_bit is enough and the loop
can be removed too.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Henzl the...@redhat.com
On 08/01/2013 03:39 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 03:11:22PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
From: Tomas Henzl the...@redhat.com
The cmd_pool_bits is protected everywhere with a spinlock,
we don't need the test_and_set_bit, set_bit is enough and the loop
can be
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 04:05:20PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
On 08/01/2013 03:39 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 03:11:22PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
From: Tomas Henzl the...@redhat.com
The cmd_pool_bits is protected everywhere with a spinlock,
we don't
On 08/01/2013 04:21 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 04:05:20PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
On 08/01/2013 03:39 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 03:11:22PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
From: Tomas Henzl the...@redhat.com
The
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 04:59:45PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
On 08/01/2013 04:21 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 04:05:20PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
On 08/01/2013 03:39 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 03:11:22PM +0200, Tomas
On 08/01/2013 05:19 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 04:59:45PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
On 08/01/2013 04:21 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 04:05:20PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
On 08/01/2013 03:39 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 05:39:36PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
On 08/01/2013 05:19 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
[...]
Btw. on line 1284 - isn't it similar to patch 2/3 ?
^^^ Oh, missed this the first time around, the sop driver uses the
make_request_fn()
interface, and it's not a
12 matches
Mail list logo
