On Wed, 2 Apr 2014 16:48:52 -0400
Joe Lawrence joe.lawre...@stratus.com wrote:
On Wed, 2 Apr 2014 16:40:41 -0400
Joe Lawrence joe.lawre...@stratus.com wrote:
Since bsg creation is a side effect of sas_rphy_add, move its
complementary removal call into sas_rphy_remove.
Hello James,
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Joe Lawrence joe.lawre...@stratus.com wrote:
On Wed, 2 Apr 2014 16:48:52 -0400
Joe Lawrence joe.lawre...@stratus.com wrote:
On Wed, 2 Apr 2014 16:40:41 -0400
Joe Lawrence joe.lawre...@stratus.com wrote:
Since bsg creation is a side effect of sas_rphy_add,
On Wed, 2 Apr 2014 16:40:41 -0400
Joe Lawrence joe.lawre...@stratus.com wrote:
Since bsg creation is a side effect of sas_rphy_add, move its
complementary removal call into sas_rphy_remove.
Hello James,
This a resend of a patch posted to quiet an end-device sysfs warning in
its device
The recent change in sysfs, bcdde7e221a8750f9b62b6d0bd31b72ea4ad9309
sysfs: make __sysfs_remove_dir() recursive revealed an asymmetric
rphy device creation/deletion sequence in scsi_transport_sas:
modprobe mpt2sas
sas_rphy_add
device_add A rphy-dev
device_add B
4 matches
Mail list logo