Increase the value of STORVSC_MAX_IO_REQUESTS to 200 requests. The current
ringbuffer size can support this higher value.
Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan k...@microsoft.com
Reviewed-by: Haiyang Zhang haiya...@microsoft.com
---
drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 05:21:19AM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
Increase the value of STORVSC_MAX_IO_REQUESTS to 200 requests. The current
ringbuffer size can support this higher value.
The ringbuffer size is a module parameter so it's odd to talk about
the current size.
regards,
dan
...@infradead.org; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; a...@canonical.com;
jasow...@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 7/7] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Increase the value of
STORVSC_MAX_IO_REQUESTS
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 05:21:19AM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
Increase the value of STORVSC_MAX_IO_REQUESTS to 200
...@linuxdriverproject.org; oher...@suse.com; jbottom...@parallels.com;
h...@infradead.org; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; a...@canonical.com;
jasow...@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 7/7] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Increase the value of
STORVSC_MAX_IO_REQUESTS
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 05:21:19AM -0700, K. Y
...@infradead.org; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; a...@canonical.com;
jasow...@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 7/7] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Increase the value of
STORVSC_MAX_IO_REQUESTS
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 01:37:41PM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Dan Carpenter
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 02:01:12PM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
Would the right fix be to add some sanity checks in module_init()?
The check is already there (as I noted above). Look at the function:
storvsc_drv_init(). If the ring size is picked incorrectly, the load is
failed.
Ah. I
6 matches
Mail list logo
