Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] sg: user controls for q_at_head, read_value

2018-10-26 Thread Douglas Gilbert
On 2018-10-26 12:48 p.m., Douglas Gilbert wrote: Add a SG_SET_GET_EXTENDED ioctl control for whether commands will be queued_at_head or queued_at_tail by the block layer (together with the scsi mid-level). It has file scope. Also add a read_value integer the can be used by write a value from the

Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] sg: user controls for q_at_head, read_value

2018-10-26 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi linux-scsi-owner, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on mkp-scsi/for-next] [also build test ERROR on v4.19 next-20181019] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url: https://github.com/0day

Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] sg: user controls for q_at_head, read_value

2018-10-26 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi linux-scsi-owner, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on mkp-scsi/for-next] [also build test ERROR on v4.19 next-20181019] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url: https://github.com/0day

[PATCH v3 8/8] sg: user controls for q_at_head, read_value

2018-10-26 Thread Douglas Gilbert
Add a SG_SET_GET_EXTENDED ioctl control for whether commands will be queued_at_head or queued_at_tail by the block layer (together with the scsi mid-level). It has file scope. Also add a read_value integer the can be used by write a value from the SG_SEIRV_* group then the corresponding value will