On 07/31/2014 05:16 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 03:56:13PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
Hi Steve, Webb,
let me start with the part most important for me - from my previous mail
And please have a look at [PATCH] hpsa: refine the pci enble/disable
handling
I
On 08/01/2014 06:40 PM, Webb Scales wrote:
On 7/31/14 9:56 AM, Tomas Henzl wrote:
In cmd_tagged_alloc Thus, there should never be a collision here between
two requests if this is true you don't need the refcount and just a simple
flag were sufficient for your other needs. (And maybe you get to
On 7/31/14 9:56 AM, Tomas Henzl wrote:
In cmd_tagged_alloc Thus, there should never be a collision here between
two requests if this is true you don't need the refcount and just a simple
flag were sufficient for your other needs. (And maybe you get to ~971k IOPS..)
:-) The code previously had
Hi Steve, Webb,
let me start with the part most important for me - from my previous mail
And please have a look at [PATCH] hpsa: refine the pci enble/disable handling
I posted in June and add it to your series or review in the list. Thanks.
other comments see below
Hi Tomas,
Thanks for
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 03:56:13PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
Hi Steve, Webb,
let me start with the part most important for me - from my previous mail
And please have a look at [PATCH] hpsa: refine the pci enble/disable
handling
I posted in June and add it to your series or review in the
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 05:24:46PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 07/25/2014 09:28 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
hpsa: Work In Progress: lockless monster patches
To be clear, I am not suggesting that these patches be merged at this time.
This patchset is vs. Christoph
On 07/25/2014 09:28 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
hpsa: Work In Progress: lockless monster patches
To be clear, I am not suggesting that these patches be merged at this time.
This patchset is vs. Christoph Hellwig's scsi-mq.4 branch which
may be found here:
Hi Tomas,
Thanks for taking a look and for the feedback. I'm actually the one
responsible for the changes you refer to, so I'll try to address your
comments.
On 7/30/14 10:55 AM, Tomas Henzl wrote:
I'm not sure if I got it right,
it seems it uses the same cmd_pool for both alloc function,
On 07/25/2014 09:28 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
hpsa: Work In Progress: lockless monster patches
To be clear, I am not suggesting that these patches be merged at this time.
This patchset is vs. Christoph Hellwig's scsi-mq.4 branch which
may be found here:
Christoph Hellwig (1):
reserve block tags in scsi host
So you found this one useful. This begs the question how we should
move forward with it, as it will only work with the blk-mq path in
it's current form.
I can see three ways:
- we implement equivalent functionality in the old block
hpsa: Work In Progress: lockless monster patches
To be clear, I am not suggesting that these patches be merged at this time.
This patchset is vs. Christoph Hellwig's scsi-mq.4 branch which
may be found here: git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/scsi.git
We've been working for a long time on a
11 matches
Mail list logo
