Re: [patch,v3,repost 00/10] make I/O path allocations more numa-friendly

James Bottomley james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com writes: On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 12:59 -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote: Jeff Moyer jmo...@redhat.com writes: Hi, This patch set makes memory allocations for data structures used in the I/O path more numa friendly by allocating them from the

Re: [patch,v3,repost 00/10] make I/O path allocations more numa-friendly

On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 12:59 -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote: Jeff Moyer jmo...@redhat.com writes: Hi, This patch set makes memory allocations for data structures used in the I/O path more numa friendly by allocating them from the same numa node as the storage device. I've only converted a

Re: [patch,v3,repost 00/10] make I/O path allocations more numa-friendly

Jeff Moyer jmo...@redhat.com writes: Hi, This patch set makes memory allocations for data structures used in the I/O path more numa friendly by allocating them from the same numa node as the storage device. I've only converted a handful of drivers at this point. My testing is limited by

[patch,v3,repost 00/10] make I/O path allocations more numa-friendly

Hi, This patch set makes memory allocations for data structures used in the I/O path more numa friendly by allocating them from the same numa node as the storage device. I've only converted a handful of drivers at this point. My testing is limited by the hardware I have on hand. Using these