On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 21:50:29 -0400, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> Umm, I hope you don't consider losing all the previous data
> on the disks when a re-format is performed as "screwing up"?
*Giggle* As I just got the disk, have no idea what's on it, and can't read
it in any case (OK, so I could use /de
James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 15:34 +, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
>> Yesterday I managed to buy a couple of SCA disks with a sector size of ...
>> *drumroll* ... 524.
>>
>> What's the easiest way to re-format these to use 512 bytes?
>> Preferably without screwing up anything else
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Yesterday I managed to buy a couple of SCA disks with a sector size of ...
> *drumroll* ... 524.
>
> What's the easiest way to re-format these to use 512 bytes?
> Preferably without screwing up anything else on these things?
Umm, I hope you don't consider los
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Yesterday I managed to buy a couple of SCA disks with a sector size of ...
> *drumroll* ... 524.
>
> What's the easiest way to re-format these to use 512 bytes?
> Preferably without screwing up anything else on these things?
>
> I tried sformat, which reporte
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 15:34 +, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Yesterday I managed to buy a couple of SCA disks with a sector size of ...
> *drumroll* ... 524.
>
> What's the easiest way to re-format these to use 512 bytes?
> Preferably without screwing up anything else on these things?
We use this
Hello,
Yesterday I managed to buy a couple of SCA disks with a sector size of ...
*drumroll* ... 524.
What's the easiest way to re-format these to use 512 bytes?
Preferably without screwing up anything else on these things?
I tried sformat, which reported some rather broken
data:
# sformat
sfor
6 matches
Mail list logo
