Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This one fixes the 4-byte hole. Thank you very much.
That's all fine, but now we have two fields doing essentially the same
thing. Care to cleanup the -timeout usage so we can get by with using
just that field?
I added another field because I couldn't
On Wed, Dec 05 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This one fixes the 4-byte hole. Thank you very much.
That's all fine, but now we have two fields doing essentially the same
thing. Care to cleanup the -timeout usage so we can get by with using
just that
Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-timeout isn't used very much, so should not be too much work to
console the two.
If you see any specific obstacles, do list them!
I believe it is used in blk_add_timer() which may be called:
1) First time sending the command to LLDs
No problem. It
On Mon, Dec 03 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 05:53:30PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I suggest running 'pahole' over this when compiled on 64-bit?
You've just introduced a 4-byte hole.
This one fixes the 4-byte hole.
Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 05:53:30PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I suggest running 'pahole' over this when compiled on 64-bit?
You've just introduced a 4-byte hole.
This one fixes the 4-byte hole. Thank you very much.
diff --git
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 05:53:30PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index 917fe86..e495d61 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -295,7 +295,8 @@ struct request {
void *data;
void *sense;
6 matches
Mail list logo
