On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 04:15:56PM -0600, Moore, Eric wrote:
On Tuesday, September 25, 2007 7:38 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
As I said, it's ambitious. But it'll let us get rid of scsi_pointer
and host_scribble entirely.
Are you serious about removing the host_scribble? In fusion we
On Tuesday, September 25, 2007 7:38 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
As I said, it's ambitious. But it'll let us get rid of scsi_pointer
and host_scribble entirely.
Are you serious about removing the host_scribble? In fusion we
currently are hanging our per request message frame pointer
Christoph grabbed me on IRC and we debated some of my plans for scsi_cmnd;
with his permission I'm summarising the result of that debate for posterity.
There's four main things discussed:
1. I'm going to be writing and posting patches over the next week or so
to kill all the (ab)uses of
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 07:37:33AM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
2. Thanks to a thinko, we also discussed the upper-layer -done. We think
it should be feasible to move this from the scsi_cmnd to the scsi_device
since sg doesn't use it.
I suspect putting it into the scsi_driver would be even
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 02:47:50PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 07:37:33AM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
2. Thanks to a thinko, we also discussed the upper-layer -done. We think
it should be feasible to move this from the scsi_cmnd to the scsi_device
since sg
On Tue, Sep 25 2007 at 15:37 +0200, Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christoph grabbed me on IRC and we debated some of my plans for scsi_cmnd;
with his permission I'm summarising the result of that debate for posterity.
There's four main things discussed:
1. I'm going to be writing
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 04:51:06PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
As I said, it's ambitious. But it'll let us get rid of scsi_pointer
and host_scribble entirely.
This all is an excellent idea and you will find that in the patchset to
gdth, I have made the work of one driver a bit easier for
7 matches
Mail list logo
