On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 03:41:35PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 22:20 +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 03:00:16PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
...
__init is possibly justifiable with a few hundred k savings on boot.
__devinit and the rest are
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 00:32 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 03:41:35PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 22:20 +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 03:00:16PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
...
__init is possibly justifiable with a few
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 04:44:12PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 00:32 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
People at linux-arch (Cc'ed) might be better at explaining how often
CONFIG_HOTPLUG gets used in real-life systems and how big the savings
are there.
That might be a
Some people consider it worth it for their memory restricted systems
and would like to drive the annotations even further. [1]
They could get much better bang-for-the-buck (as in memory saved
for amount of work invested) by tackling some the dynamic memory allocation
pigs.
In general it's a
I don't deny we can invest large amounts of work to fix our current
issues and build large scriptable checks to ensure we keep it fixed ...
I'm just asking if, at the end of the day, it's really worth it.
Some people consider it worth it for their memory restricted systems
and would
5 matches
Mail list logo
