On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 05:39:06PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
There are two patches for each driver, removing the non-use-sg code
and converting to use the accessors.
...
I merged the two. And I finished cleaning up 35 drivers in total.
On Tue, May 15, 2007 01:41, Satyam Sharma wrote:
On 5/14/07, James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 17:53 +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
I guess this is probably the behaviour that James wanted originally?
No ... you're still not reading the explanation in the thread:
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 10:01 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 05:39:06PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
There are two patches for each driver, removing the non-use-sg code
and converting to use the accessors.
...
I merged the two. And I
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 06:54:16AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
Er ... I really hope not ... that's exactly how the parisc iommu
platform code works ... and why I designed the generic dma mapping this
way. The key thing parisc needed was the ability to walk up different
busses until it found
As discussed in the bugzilla outlined below, we have an sa based
(Mustang) RAID adapter on the system, a Dell PERC2/QC. Affected
controllers are HP NetRAID, Adaptec AAC-364, Dell PERC2/QC or Adaptec
5400S. This problem coincides with the introduction of the adapter_comm
and adapter_deliver
Hello, Henrique.
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Francesco Pretto wrote:
Ubuntu [1] ang Gentoo [2] bugs opened. Sent a mail to Miquel van
Smoorenburg, dev of sysvinit.
For all Debian sysvinit issues, please send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (added to CC).
For the
On 15/05/07 13:02, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 12:26:29PM +0100, Simon Arlott wrote:
I've already suggested a sysfs attribute - or something equivalent - would
be much better. It's just one function that a user might want to run multiple
times (e.g. after adding scsi devices?)
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 12:57 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 06:54:16AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
Er ... I really hope not ... that's exactly how the parisc iommu
platform code works ... and why I designed the generic dma mapping this
way. The key thing parisc
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 05:30:50PM +0100, Simon Arlott wrote:
On 15/05/07 13:02, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
It's easy to suggest a sysfs attribute. What you've failed to do is
suggest the pathname of the sysfs attribute, the contents of it, or the
semantics of it (read-only? read-write?
From: James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 12:57:25 -0400
It might make sense to put it in lib ... however, I don't think many
architectures have the problems we have ... specifically certain boxes
can have 1 IOMMU, then you really have to know *which* iommu you're
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 13:37 -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 12:57:25 -0400
It might make sense to put it in lib ... however, I don't think many
architectures have the problems we have ... specifically certain boxes
can have 1
Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/scsi/Kconfig | 14 +++---
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.22-rc1/drivers/scsi/Kconfig
===
---
Hi,
[ I appreciate you forked the thread and gave it a better subject name,
it would be better still if you could maintain the original CC list, thanks. ]
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 12:26:29PM +0100, Simon Arlott wrote:
I've already suggested a sysfs attribute - or something equivalent - would
be
Satyam Sharma wrote:
semantics of it (read-only? read-write? write-only?
Well, it _has_ to be write, don't really care if it's read-write or
write-only. I would still prefer read-write, but we can go ahead with
write-only too. It doesn't really matter, does it?
just to be devils
On 5/16/07, Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Satyam Sharma wrote:
semantics of it (read-only? read-write? write-only?
Well, it _has_ to be write, don't really care if it's read-write or
write-only. I would still prefer read-write, but we can go ahead with
write-only too. It
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 04:57:52AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
[ I appreciate you forked the thread and gave it a better subject name,
it would be better still if you could maintain the original CC list,
thanks. ]
I removed the people I didn't think needed to be on the Cc list any more,
since
No, it does matter. Your suggestion doesn't work, because
/sys/module/scsi_mod/parameters/ belongs to the module code. To create
a new attribute there, you use the module_param() code -- and there's
no way to have code called when your parameter is changed.
If I'm not misunderstanding
17 matches
Mail list logo
