On 12/13/12 17:49, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 05:47:14PM +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote:
From my experience with block and SCSI drivers option (1) doesn't
look attractive from a performance point of view. From what I have
seen performance with QD=1 is several times lower
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:44:34AM +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 12/13/12 17:49, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 05:47:14PM +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote:
From my experience with block and SCSI drivers option (1) doesn't
look attractive from a performance point of view.
James Bottomley james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com writes:
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 12:59 -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote:
Jeff Moyer jmo...@redhat.com writes:
Hi,
This patch set makes memory allocations for data structures used in
the I/O path more numa friendly by allocating them from the
On 12/14/12 17:44, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
I expect the flash devices re-order requests as well, simply because
to feed requests to the things at a sufficient rate, you have to pump
requests into them concurrently on multiple hardware queues -- a single
cpu jamming requests into them
On 12/07/2012 08:05 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
please qlogic guys, send latest fw to upstream linux-firmware.git
linux-firmware brings old releases:
File: ql2400_fw.bin
Version: 5.06.05 MID
File: ql2500_fw.bin
Version: 5.06.05 MIDQ
qlogic-ftp releases:
ql2400_fw.bin -- 5.08.00
On Fri, 14 Dec 2012, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
On 12/07/2012 08:05 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
please qlogic guys, send latest fw to upstream linux-firmware.git
linux-firmware brings old releases:
File: ql2400_fw.bin
Version: 5.06.05 MID
File: ql2500_fw.bin
Version: 5.06.05 MIDQ
On Wed 12 Dec 2012 11:54:10 PM PST, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 12/13/12 00:22, Robert Love wrote:
@@ -210,25 +210,23 @@ static ssize_t
show_fcoe_fcf_device_##field(struct device *dev,\
#define fcoe_enum_name_search(title, table_type, table)\
static const char
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 05:15:37PM +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 12/14/12 17:44, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
I expect the flash devices re-order requests as well, simply because
to feed requests to the things at a sufficient rate, you have to pump
requests into them concurrently on
On 12/14/12 20:55, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
It's not so much that they are re-ordered as that there is no controlled
ordering to begin with because multiple cpus are submitting to multiple
hardware queues concurrently. If you have 12 requests coming in on 12
cpus to 12 hardware queues
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 08:28:56PM +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 12/14/12 20:55, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
It's not so much that they are re-ordered as that there is no controlled
ordering to begin with because multiple cpus are submitting to multiple
hardware queues concurrently.
Instead of creating a structure with an enum and a pointer
to a string, simply allocate an array of strings and use
the enum values for the indicies.
This means that we do not need to iterate through the list
of entries when looking up a string name by its enum key.
This will also help with a
On Wed 12 Dec 2012 04:45:50 PM PST, Robert Love wrote:
The following changes since commit b69f0859dc8e633c5d8c06845811588fe17e68b3:
Linux 3.7-rc8 (2012-12-03 11:22:37 -0800)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rwlove/fcoe.git
The following changes since commit b69f0859dc8e633c5d8c06845811588fe17e68b3:
Linux 3.7-rc8 (2012-12-03 11:22:37 -0800)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rwlove/fcoe.git
tags/for-next-12-14-12
for you to fetch changes up to
Hello Linus!
Here are the target updates for v3.8-rc1 merge window code. Please go
ahead and pull from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nab/target-pending.git for-next
Just a heads up that there is a minor merge conflict that you'll
encounter in target_handle_task_attr() code,
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 15:22 +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
于 2012年12月14日 14:57, Stefan Richter 写道:
On Dec 14 Chen Gang wrote:
于 2012年12月10日 16:02, Chris Boot 写道:
On 10/12/12 02:39, Chen Gang wrote:
Hello Chris Boot:
need I send the relative patch ?
Hi Chen,
Sorry, life got in the
于 2012年12月15日 08:33, Nicholas A. Bellinger 写道:
FYI folks, this fix from Chris was included in the [GIT PULL] request
for v3.8-rc1 sent out today.
thanks
and now I am in target-de...@vger.kernel.org, too.
:-)
Thanks!
--nab
--
Chen Gang
Asianux Corporation
--
To
16 matches
Mail list logo
