Re: [PATCH] target/user: Add daynmic growing data area featuresupport

2017-02-26 Thread Xiubo Li
Cool. This is a good approach for an initial patch but this raises concerns about efficiently managing kernel memory usage -- the data area grows but never shrinks, and total possible usage increases per backstore. (What if there are 1000?) Any ideas how we could also improve these aspects of

Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] phy: exynos-ufs: add UFS PHY driver for EXYNOS SoC

2017-02-26 Thread Kishon Vijay Abraham I
Hi, On Thursday 23 February 2017 12:20 AM, Alim Akhtar wrote: > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Alim Akhtar wrote: >> Hi Kishon, >> >> >> On 11/19/2015 07:09 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Tuesday 17 November 2015 01:41 PM, Alim Akhtar wrote:

Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] do we really need PG_error at all?

2017-02-26 Thread NeilBrown
On Sun, Feb 26 2017, James Bottomley wrote: > On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 08:03 +1100, NeilBrown wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 26 2017, James Bottomley wrote: >> >> > [added linux-scsi and linux-block because this is part of our error >> > handling as well] >> > On Sun, 2017-02-26 at 09:42 -0500, Jeff Layton

Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] do we really need PG_error at all?

2017-02-26 Thread Jeff Layton
On Sun, 2017-02-26 at 15:30 -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 08:03 +1100, NeilBrown wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 26 2017, James Bottomley wrote: > > > > > [added linux-scsi and linux-block because this is part of our error > > > handling as well] > > > On Sun, 2017-02-26 at 09:42

Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] do we really need PG_error at all?

2017-02-26 Thread James Bottomley
On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 08:03 +1100, NeilBrown wrote: > On Sun, Feb 26 2017, James Bottomley wrote: > > > [added linux-scsi and linux-block because this is part of our error > > handling as well] > > On Sun, 2017-02-26 at 09:42 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > > > Proposing this as a LSF/MM TOPIC, but

Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] do we really need PG_error at all?

2017-02-26 Thread Jeff Layton
On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 08:03 +1100, NeilBrown wrote: > On Sun, Feb 26 2017, James Bottomley wrote: > > > [added linux-scsi and linux-block because this is part of our error > > handling as well] > > On Sun, 2017-02-26 at 09:42 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > > > Proposing this as a LSF/MM TOPIC, but

Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] do we really need PG_error at all?

2017-02-26 Thread NeilBrown
On Sun, Feb 26 2017, James Bottomley wrote: > [added linux-scsi and linux-block because this is part of our error > handling as well] > On Sun, 2017-02-26 at 09:42 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: >> Proposing this as a LSF/MM TOPIC, but it may turn out to be me just >> not understanding the semantics

RE: [PATCH] scsi: aacraid: remove redundant zero check on ret

2017-02-26 Thread Dave Carroll
> -Original Message- > From: Colin King [mailto:colin.k...@canonical.com] > Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 7:44 AM > To: dl-esc-Aacraid Linux Driver; James E . J . Bottomley; Martin K . > Petersen; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org > Cc: kernel-janit...@vger.kernel.org;

Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] do we really need PG_error at all?

2017-02-26 Thread James Bottomley
[added linux-scsi and linux-block because this is part of our error handling as well] On Sun, 2017-02-26 at 09:42 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > Proposing this as a LSF/MM TOPIC, but it may turn out to be me just > not understanding the semantics here. > > As I was looking into -ENOSPC handling in