D file, it
corrupts the data in the sector by splicing some of the original
bytes in. The page of the first entry of cmd->t_data_sg includes the
CDB, and sg->offset is set to a position past the CDB. I presume that
sg->offset is also the right choice to use for subsequent sglist
members.
Signed-
In include/uapi/linux/capability.h, next to CAP_SYS_ADMIN, one will find
the notice
/* Allow enabling/disabling tagged queuing on SCSI controllers and sending
arbitrary SCSI commands */
#define CAP_SYS_ADMIN 21
To the best of my knowledge, arbitrary commands can be issued with
the SG_IO
On Friday 2013-02-22 20:28, Martin Svec wrote:
Yes, I've already tried the ROW scheduler. It helped for some low iodepths
depending on quantum settings but generally didn't solve the problem. I think
the key issue is that none of the schedulers can throttle I/O according to
e.g.
average
I have here a system with Linux 3.4.4 and what seems to be flakey
PCI bridge hardware, as it has occurred previously on different SATA
controllers and had fixed itself up after a reboot.
Anyhow, as a result of the disk disappearing, sd_mod will
deregister it so that /dev/sdl will be
On Feb 13 2008 13:07, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
+static struct pci_device_id gdthtable[] __devinitdata = {
+ { PCI_VDEVICE(VORTEX, PCI_ANY_ID) },
+ { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_SRC) },
+ { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_SRC_XSCALE) },
+ { } /* terminate list
On Feb 13 2008 11:03, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
I've tested this patch now - and it works fine. Now rmmod, halt and
reboot also works.
Stefan Priebe
This is grate news Stefan. Thank you very much for all your time
and effort, with out we could not have fixed all this.
Do you have a git tree
Hi,
On Jan 31 2008 14:35, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
Thanks, Perhaps someone else then.
Anyone with gdth HW that can test patches?
Is bisecting down the existing chain and finding the bad commit
sufficient? (I also take new patches.)
Your lspci said: Intel Corporation RAID Controller Matthew
is
Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c | 10 +-
drivers/scsi/sg.c|8
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c
index d6a98bc..002f541 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc
Hi,
I am using 2.6.23-rc9 with pata_sis. `modprobe -r sd_mod`, which I ran
from initramfs, caused all my disks to spindown - sd even told me so.
I recall there has been talk a while back about whether to spin down
disks on shutdown or not, but I do not think it touched the removal of
Hi list,
issuing `echo - - - /sys/class/scsi_host/host0/scan` where host0 is a
0001:00:03.0 SCSI storage controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c875
(rev 14)
sym0: 875 rev 0x14 at pci 0001:00:03.0 irq 13
does not produce any dmesg messages (2.6.21), so I suspect it did not
rescan the bus;
On Aug 28 2007 20:55, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
Fwiw I do like your debloat patch a lot; it's just only half the
equation ... if you also do the namespace fixes, I bet the driver
debloats even more...
Yes, I know, and I am happy to do that too. I just don't know
whether patches will be accepted.
On Aug 30 2007 13:02, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
Well, you can send it to Linus/Andrew, that will usually upset people and
they
start commenting on it. Or they don't, and everything is fine.
(The default y approach so to speak ;-)
The problem is that we don't really have a maintainer for the
On Jul 31 2007 20:24, Maarten Bressers wrote:
Hi Petr,
The patch you posted for the MPT Fusion driver regression with VMware
5.5.4 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/23/345) was used to fix a Gentoo
kernel bug (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=185272).
Have you received word from upstream
On May 13 2007 12:48, James Bottomley wrote:
Why does ATA select SCSI anyway? Surely PATA doesn't require it?
That's a bit offtopic and to the wrong list.
libata-pata does require SCSI ...
And in the long run, that SCSI parts which are actually used by ATA
should be factored out so that SCSI
On May 14 2007 19:46, Alan Cox wrote:
On May 13 2007 12:48, James Bottomley wrote:
Why does ATA select SCSI anyway? Surely PATA doesn't require it?
That's a bit offtopic and to the wrong list.
libata-pata does require SCSI ...
And in the long run, that SCSI parts which are actually used
Change Kconfig objects from menu, config into menuconfig so
that the user can disable the whole feature without having to
enter the menu first.
Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/message/fusion/Kconfig | 14 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions
Make a menuconfig out of the Kconfig objects menu, ..., endmenu,
so that the user can disable all the options in that menu at once
instead of having to disable each option separately.
Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/scsi/Kconfig|8 ++--
drivers/scsi
On Apr 27 2007 00:28, David Miller wrote:
This is the patch I intend to send to Linus via my
sparc-2.6 tree.
Thanks to everyone for the review and testing!
commit cd9ad58d4061494e7fdd70ded7bcf2418daf356a
Author: David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu Apr 26 21:19:23 2007 -0700
Would
On Apr 27 2007 01:24, David Miller wrote:
On Apr 27 2007 00:28, David Miller wrote:
This is the patch I intend to send to Linus via my
sparc-2.6 tree.
Thanks to everyone for the review and testing!
commit cd9ad58d4061494e7fdd70ded7bcf2418daf356a
Author: David S. Miller [EMAIL
Use menuconfigs instead of menus, so the whole menu can be disabled at
once instead of going through all options.
Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux-2.6.21-rc5/drivers/message/fusion/Kconfig
Use menuconfigs instead of menus, so the whole menu can be disabled at
once instead of going through all options.
Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux-2.6.21-rc5/drivers/scsi/Kconfig
===
--- linux
On Mar 11 2007 18:51, Ric Wheeler wrote:
During the recent IO/FS workshop, we spoke briefly about the
coming change to a 4k sector size for disks on linux. If I
recall correctly, the general feeling was that the impact was
not significant since we already do most file system IO in 4k
page
On Mar 11 2007 22:45, Ric Wheeler wrote:
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Mar 11 2007 18:51, Ric Wheeler wrote:
During the recent IO/FS workshop, we spoke briefly about the
coming change to a 4k sector size for disks on linux. If I
recall correctly, the general feeling was that the impact
23 matches
Mail list logo
