Brian,
>> Thanks for the detailed analysis. This is very helpful. Have you
>> considered to change the ipr driver such that it terminates REPORT
>> SUPPORTED OPERATION CODES commands with the appropriate check
>> condition code instead of DID_ERROR?
>
> Yes. That data is actually in the sense
On Fri, 2017-08-18 at 16:57 -0500, Brian King wrote:
> To add to my analysis above, #9 should not be there... It looks like
> jiffies_at_alloc would also be getting reinitialized in this case, resulting
> in
> a perpetual retry, which is what I was seeing.
Hello Brian,
Some time ago I noticed
On 08/18/2017 04:41 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-08-18 at 16:04 -0500, Brian King wrote:
>> I think I have an understanding what is going on and why Bart's patch is
>> causing problems for ipr.
>> I can work around the boot hang in ipr, but ultimately I think we need to
>> figure
On Fri, 2017-08-18 at 16:04 -0500, Brian King wrote:
> I think I have an understanding what is going on and why Bart's patch is
> causing problems for ipr.
> I can work around the boot hang in ipr, but ultimately I think we need to
> figure out a fix
> in scsi / block. I added some tracing and
On 08/17/2017 10:52 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-08-16 at 18:18 -0500, Brian King wrote:
>> On 08/16/2017 12:21 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2017-08-16 at 22:30 +0530, Abdul Haleem wrote:
As of next-20170809, linux-next on powerpc boot hung with below trace
On Wed, 2017-08-16 at 18:18 -0500, Brian King wrote:
> On 08/16/2017 12:21 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-08-16 at 22:30 +0530, Abdul Haleem wrote:
> > > As of next-20170809, linux-next on powerpc boot hung with below trace
> > > message.
> > >
> > > [ ... ]
> > >
> > > A bisection
6 matches
Mail list logo
