On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 11:45:13AM -0400, James Smart wrote:
True - so this means that who-ever is setting the subchannel device
permanent_port_name value needs to take into account this conversation,
when T11.3 actually makes a choice on what it should be.
I will keep this in mind. Probably
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 11:56:38AM -0400, James Smart wrote:
All true. But, there is the notion that there is a driver that thinks
it's controlling the adapter, but it's actually talking to a virtual
thing, that traps the driver's FLOGI's and turns it into FDISCs...
With zfcp, the hardware
James,
i try to understand what the introduction of the vports means for zfcp, since
this driver also supports NPIV. The documentation for the fc transport class
describes a driver that would fully control the adapter and the creation of
virtual address. Since you mentioned Xen, i assume that
reposting w/ the title
James Smart wrote:
Christof Schmitt wrote:
James,
i try to understand what the introduction of the vports means for
zfcp, since
this driver also supports NPIV. The documentation for the fc transport
class
describes a driver that would fully control the adapter and
4 matches
Mail list logo
