ikov
> Cc: Vinayak Holikatti ; Avi Shchislowski ; Alex Lemberg ;
> subha...@codeaurora.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] scsi: Add ufs transport class
>
> On Tue, 2018-08-14 at 11:42 +, Stanislav Nijnikov wrote:
> > From: Bart Van Assche
> > > Are you perhaps referring
On Tue, 2018-08-14 at 11:42 +, Stanislav Nijnikov wrote:
> From: Bart Van Assche
> > Are you perhaps referring to the transport_class_register() calls in SCSI
> > transport drivers? From what I see in existing SCSI transport drivers the
> > transport_class_register() function is used to
ti ; Avi Shchislowski ; Alex Lemberg ; Stanislav Nijnikov
> ; subha...@codeaurora.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] scsi: Add ufs transport class
>
> On Thu, 2018-08-09 at 23:32 +, Avri Altman wrote:
> > And as I said before, we think that maintaining the flexibility to have
On 2018-08-09 07:51 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On Thu, 2018-08-09 at 23:32 +, Avri Altman wrote:
And as I said before, we think that maintaining the flexibility to have
more-than-one
bsg device nodes, will be useful serving as a testing and validation
environment.
That is a very vague
On Thu, 2018-08-09 at 23:32 +, Avri Altman wrote:
> And as I said before, we think that maintaining the flexibility to have
> more-than-one
> bsg device nodes, will be useful serving as a testing and validation
> environment.
That is a very vague statement. Please clarify.
> >> "...
> >>
tin.peter...@oracle.com;
> > j...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
> > Cc: Vinayak Holikatti ; Avi Shchislowski ; Alex Lemberg ; Stanislav
> > Nijnikov ;
> > subha...@codeaurora.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] scsi: Add ufs transport class
> >
> > On Sun, 2018-08-05 at
ti ; Avi Shchislowski ; Alex Lemberg ; Stanislav Nijnikov ;
> subha...@codeaurora.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] scsi: Add ufs transport class
>
> On Sun, 2018-08-05 at 14:39 +0300, Avri Altman wrote:
> > A “ufs-port” is purely a software object. Evidently, the function
&g
ti ; Avi Shchislowski ; Alex Lemberg ; Stanislav Nijnikov ;
> subha...@codeaurora.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] scsi: Add ufs transport class
>
> On Sun, 2018-08-05 at 14:39 +0300, Avri Altman wrote:
> > +config SCSI_UFS_ATTRS
> > + tristate "UFS Transport
On Sun, 2018-08-05 at 14:39 +0300, Avri Altman wrote:
> A “ufs-port” is purely a software object. Evidently, the function
> template takes no port as an argument, as the driver has no concept
> of "port". We only need it as a hanging point in the bsg device tree,
> so maybe a more appropriate
Scsi transport is a framework that allow to send scsi commands to
a non-scsi devices. Still, it is flexible enough to allow
sending non-scsi commands as well. We will use this framework to
manage ufs devices by sending UPIU transactions.
In addition to the basic SCSI core objects this transport
10 matches
Mail list logo
